<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Artistic racism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bycommonconsent.com/2006/02/02/artistic-racism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bycommonconsent.com/2006/02/02/artistic-racism/</link>
	<description>A Mormon Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 12:20:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul McKinnus</title>
		<link>http://bycommonconsent.com/2006/02/02/artistic-racism/#comment-48871</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul McKinnus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2006 05:54:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bycommonconsent.com/2006/02/artistic-racism/#comment-48871</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sorry not to clarify earlier, but that last bit was from an interview with the author.

I thought this was interesting:

&quot;At African Ancestry, an unhappy customer peppered company President Gina Paige with e-mails after DNA testing of his male line indicated that he had descended from a white man. &quot;He was especially upset that (the ancestor) was German,&quot; she recalls. &quot;More so than white, he had a problem with being even a little bit German.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry not to clarify earlier, but that last bit was from an interview with the author.</p>
<p>I thought this was interesting:</p>
<p>&#8220;At African Ancestry, an unhappy customer peppered company President Gina Paige with e-mails after DNA testing of his male line indicated that he had descended from a white man. &#8220;He was especially upset that (the ancestor) was German,&#8221; she recalls. &#8220;More so than white, he had a problem with being even a little bit German.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul McKinnus</title>
		<link>http://bycommonconsent.com/2006/02/02/artistic-racism/#comment-48870</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul McKinnus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2006 05:18:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bycommonconsent.com/2006/02/artistic-racism/#comment-48870</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[West Des Moines, IA: What does all this new knowledge say about such things as race and family heritage, how we see ourselves and others, and what is real about them and what is not? How can we use the knowledge to free ourselves from old ideas about race and family and nationality and such that impede human progress?
Claudia Kalb: Another important point. As much as there are concerns about dangerous stereotyping and ethnic and racial divisions, there is also hope that by learning more about our lineage, we will learn to appreciate our common heritage. Most scientists support the theory that all humans evolved in Africa and then some groups migrated out around the world. The genetic &quot;Adam&quot; and &quot;Eve&quot; add weight to that theory. And then there&#039;s the fact that any two people share DNA that is 99.9 identical. All of this argues for a radical step away from old ideas about race and nationality and a giant step toward unity. Forget about skin color and religion: underneath it all, we are all genetically related.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>West Des Moines, IA: What does all this new knowledge say about such things as race and family heritage, how we see ourselves and others, and what is real about them and what is not? How can we use the knowledge to free ourselves from old ideas about race and family and nationality and such that impede human progress?<br />
Claudia Kalb: Another important point. As much as there are concerns about dangerous stereotyping and ethnic and racial divisions, there is also hope that by learning more about our lineage, we will learn to appreciate our common heritage. Most scientists support the theory that all humans evolved in Africa and then some groups migrated out around the world. The genetic &#8220;Adam&#8221; and &#8220;Eve&#8221; add weight to that theory. And then there&#8217;s the fact that any two people share DNA that is 99.9 identical. All of this argues for a radical step away from old ideas about race and nationality and a giant step toward unity. Forget about skin color and religion: underneath it all, we are all genetically related.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul McKinnus</title>
		<link>http://bycommonconsent.com/2006/02/02/artistic-racism/#comment-48869</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul McKinnus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2006 05:05:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bycommonconsent.com/2006/02/artistic-racism/#comment-48869</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Common origin in Africa is only ONE of the human origin theories based on evolution and migration. To single out that &quot;all signs point to Africa&quot; and not even mention the opposing point of view holding that there were several locations where humanity sprung up reveals Newsweek&#039;s agenda and purposeful bias. Just who&#039;s &quot;common ancestors&quot; are they talking about? Yet the general population buys into the rhetoric of the age of internationalist thinking without a single afterthought. Newsweek&#039;s article is just another attempt to indoctrinate and make the concept of &quot;white&quot; look ridiculous. There are plenty of holes in the Africa origin theory, and any standard text dealing with evolution always acknowledges both theories.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Common origin in Africa is only ONE of the human origin theories based on evolution and migration. To single out that &#8220;all signs point to Africa&#8221; and not even mention the opposing point of view holding that there were several locations where humanity sprung up reveals Newsweek&#8217;s agenda and purposeful bias. Just who&#8217;s &#8220;common ancestors&#8221; are they talking about? Yet the general population buys into the rhetoric of the age of internationalist thinking without a single afterthought. Newsweek&#8217;s article is just another attempt to indoctrinate and make the concept of &#8220;white&#8221; look ridiculous. There are plenty of holes in the Africa origin theory, and any standard text dealing with evolution always acknowledges both theories.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marcus Lloyd</title>
		<link>http://bycommonconsent.com/2006/02/02/artistic-racism/#comment-48868</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marcus Lloyd]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2006 03:51:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bycommonconsent.com/2006/02/artistic-racism/#comment-48868</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey all,

Help me out, I&#039;m colour blind what does white look like anyway? Now, if I could hear a sample of what they sounded like maybe I can get a better ethnic picture of their racial makeup.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey all,</p>
<p>Help me out, I&#8217;m colour blind what does white look like anyway? Now, if I could hear a sample of what they sounded like maybe I can get a better ethnic picture of their racial makeup.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: harpingheather</title>
		<link>http://bycommonconsent.com/2006/02/02/artistic-racism/#comment-48867</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[harpingheather]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2006 16:24:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bycommonconsent.com/2006/02/artistic-racism/#comment-48867</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not to derail the thread or anything but I wonder if you all could give me a hand.

I&#039;d like to offer a special present to the girl in my Sunday School class who does the best this year.  (Bribery is not only wrong, it&#039;s absolutely necessary.)  I&#039;m considering giving them their choice of (a) a nice CTR ring, (b) scripture study materials or (c) some spiritual art.

Now it just so happens that all three girls in my class are of African descent.  So I&#039;d like to offer them pictures with African people.  There was a beautiful picture of Jesus talking with a young woman and teaching her not to hide her candle under a bushel but the girl was Caucasian.   Does anyone know where I can find art like that?  Keeping in mind that I live more than 500 miles away from the nearest &quot;This Is The Place&quot; store.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not to derail the thread or anything but I wonder if you all could give me a hand.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d like to offer a special present to the girl in my Sunday School class who does the best this year.  (Bribery is not only wrong, it&#8217;s absolutely necessary.)  I&#8217;m considering giving them their choice of (a) a nice CTR ring, (b) scripture study materials or (c) some spiritual art.</p>
<p>Now it just so happens that all three girls in my class are of African descent.  So I&#8217;d like to offer them pictures with African people.  There was a beautiful picture of Jesus talking with a young woman and teaching her not to hide her candle under a bushel but the girl was Caucasian.   Does anyone know where I can find art like that?  Keeping in mind that I live more than 500 miles away from the nearest &#8220;This Is The Place&#8221; store.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: not ophelia</title>
		<link>http://bycommonconsent.com/2006/02/02/artistic-racism/#comment-48866</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[not ophelia]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2006 23:58:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bycommonconsent.com/2006/02/artistic-racism/#comment-48866</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, here&#039;s something else about the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tmoc.com.au/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;the Mark of Cain&lt;/a&gt;

Who&#039;d&#039;ve thought . . .

N.O.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, here&#8217;s something else about the <a href="http://www.tmoc.com.au/" rel="nofollow">the Mark of Cain</a></p>
<p>Who&#8217;d've thought . . .</p>
<p>N.O.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ruby on Rails</title>
		<link>http://bycommonconsent.com/2006/02/02/artistic-racism/#comment-48865</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ruby on Rails]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2006 20:51:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bycommonconsent.com/2006/02/artistic-racism/#comment-48865</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Back at post 58 Frank (without reading the thread!) started a ruckus by claiming &quot;Cain was given a mark, being a skin of blackness.&quot; I&#039;ve now read all the comments and the scriptures involved. Unless someone has more evidence to offer (Frank, do you have an ace up your sleeve?), THERE IS NO SCRIPTURE THAT SAYS CAIN WAS MARKED WITH A SKIN OF BLACKNESS (much less that his children were).
I think thatâ€™s the main take-home point for me. Yes, Frank and Eric can find it reasonable to speculate that â€œblackâ€ in Mos. 7:22 means black skin. I disagree with that interpretation, and find it possible, but not reasonable.

If I read the verse in context, along with the rest of the chapter/vision, and with or without the context of the other relevant scriptural texts and historical context, I find an interpretation of â€œblack skinâ€ unlikely-not as unlikely as interpreting verse 28 to mean that rain comes from godâ€™s tears (#94), but unlikely (and then, highly unlikely in light of the information about how the slavery of black Africans impacted readings of the Cain and Ham verses).
I learned a lot from this thread. Thanks.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Back at post 58 Frank (without reading the thread!) started a ruckus by claiming &#8220;Cain was given a mark, being a skin of blackness.&#8221; I&#8217;ve now read all the comments and the scriptures involved. Unless someone has more evidence to offer (Frank, do you have an ace up your sleeve?), THERE IS NO SCRIPTURE THAT SAYS CAIN WAS MARKED WITH A SKIN OF BLACKNESS (much less that his children were).<br />
I think thatâ€™s the main take-home point for me. Yes, Frank and Eric can find it reasonable to speculate that â€œblackâ€ in Mos. 7:22 means black skin. I disagree with that interpretation, and find it possible, but not reasonable.</p>
<p>If I read the verse in context, along with the rest of the chapter/vision, and with or without the context of the other relevant scriptural texts and historical context, I find an interpretation of â€œblack skinâ€ unlikely-not as unlikely as interpreting verse 28 to mean that rain comes from godâ€™s tears (#94), but unlikely (and then, highly unlikely in light of the information about how the slavery of black Africans impacted readings of the Cain and Ham verses).<br />
I learned a lot from this thread. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Royal g</title>
		<link>http://bycommonconsent.com/2006/02/02/artistic-racism/#comment-48864</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Royal g]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2006 20:27:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bycommonconsent.com/2006/02/artistic-racism/#comment-48864</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I suggest that this blog is a demonstration that the interpretation of the Adam and Eve story, of this painting, and of the cited scriptures is a political activity.
Some think that Genesis 4, 9, and Mos 5, 7, donâ€™t contain references to skin color marks or curses. Others think that if you squeeze hard enough, the marks/curses bleed through as black. Others claim a â€œliteralâ€ reading yields references to skin color (though, this resort to the authority of â€œwhat does the text say literallyâ€ confused me since whether or not the text is meant to be taken literally, the text doesnâ€™t â€œliterallyâ€ say skin color. If it has that meaning (I grant it may), it is only through at least some figurative extension).

I find it interesting that the women whoâ€™ve posted seem not to buy a â€œCain was blackâ€ interpretation, and that among the men there seems to be a strong correlation between the authorâ€™s spot on the cultural and political conservative/liberal spectrum (my judgment here comes from reading their T&amp;S, Bcc, ldslibfront, and BS posts), and whether he is more likely to accept a reading that turns Cainâ€™s skin dark.  Of course, this group of bloggers is a self-selected sample, so I donâ€™t mean to draw any population-wide conclusions, Iâ€™m just describing a tentative observation.

Following Justinâ€™s lead in 209, here are some other questions that I think are relevant as to how a person readâ€™s experiences these texts.

O  Do you believe the Churchâ€™s temple and priesthood ban regarding people with black African ancestors was divinely inspired?
O  Do you believe there is any religious reason that people with different skin colors and ethnic backgrounds should not marry?
O  Do you regard the story of Adam and Eve in the Garden as recounting historical events that occurred as described?
O  What is your own skin color?
O  What is your understanding of why variations in human skin color exist? (is your answer for this any different than as to why there are variations in whether the second toe is longer than the big toe?)
O  Do you believe there are separate human races. (If so, how many?)
O  Have you sent your DNA sample to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www3.nationalgeographic.com/genographic/index.html &quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; National Geographic  &lt;/a&gt; yet for a report of your â€œdeep ancestral history?â€]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suggest that this blog is a demonstration that the interpretation of the Adam and Eve story, of this painting, and of the cited scriptures is a political activity.<br />
Some think that Genesis 4, 9, and Mos 5, 7, donâ€™t contain references to skin color marks or curses. Others think that if you squeeze hard enough, the marks/curses bleed through as black. Others claim a â€œliteralâ€ reading yields references to skin color (though, this resort to the authority of â€œwhat does the text say literallyâ€ confused me since whether or not the text is meant to be taken literally, the text doesnâ€™t â€œliterallyâ€ say skin color. If it has that meaning (I grant it may), it is only through at least some figurative extension).</p>
<p>I find it interesting that the women whoâ€™ve posted seem not to buy a â€œCain was blackâ€ interpretation, and that among the men there seems to be a strong correlation between the authorâ€™s spot on the cultural and political conservative/liberal spectrum (my judgment here comes from reading their T&amp;S, Bcc, ldslibfront, and BS posts), and whether he is more likely to accept a reading that turns Cainâ€™s skin dark.  Of course, this group of bloggers is a self-selected sample, so I donâ€™t mean to draw any population-wide conclusions, Iâ€™m just describing a tentative observation.</p>
<p>Following Justinâ€™s lead in 209, here are some other questions that I think are relevant as to how a person readâ€™s experiences these texts.</p>
<p>O  Do you believe the Churchâ€™s temple and priesthood ban regarding people with black African ancestors was divinely inspired?<br />
O  Do you believe there is any religious reason that people with different skin colors and ethnic backgrounds should not marry?<br />
O  Do you regard the story of Adam and Eve in the Garden as recounting historical events that occurred as described?<br />
O  What is your own skin color?<br />
O  What is your understanding of why variations in human skin color exist? (is your answer for this any different than as to why there are variations in whether the second toe is longer than the big toe?)<br />
O  Do you believe there are separate human races. (If so, how many?)<br />
O  Have you sent your DNA sample to <a href="https://www3.nationalgeographic.com/genographic/index.html " rel="nofollow"> National Geographic  </a> yet for a report of your â€œdeep ancestral history?â€</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ronan</title>
		<link>http://bycommonconsent.com/2006/02/02/artistic-racism/#comment-48863</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ronan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2006 16:31:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bycommonconsent.com/2006/02/artistic-racism/#comment-48863</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[jjohnsen,
You&#039;re very kind. I&#039;ll post a PayPal link soon.

Justin,
who knew you could be funny? where&#039;s the Mormon history oddity here?!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jjohnsen,<br />
You&#8217;re very kind. I&#8217;ll post a PayPal link soon.</p>
<p>Justin,<br />
who knew you could be funny? where&#8217;s the Mormon history oddity here?!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin</title>
		<link>http://bycommonconsent.com/2006/02/02/artistic-racism/#comment-48862</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Justin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2006 16:11:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bycommonconsent.com/2006/02/artistic-racism/#comment-48862</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I suggest a BCC interview with the artist of &lt;i&gt;Adam and Eve in the Garden&lt;/i&gt;.

Some possible questions:

*Did you use models for the painting?
*Were they a 30-something couple from Orem?  If so, do you think that there is anything wrong with that?
*What is the theological significance of the fact that Adam and Eve both sported 80s hairdo&#039;s and that Adam wore a miniskirt?
*Are they wearing mini-skirts &lt;i&gt;or&lt;/i&gt; deerskin kilts?
*Why does Adam have darker skin than Eve?
*Are Adam and Eve in the garden (In-A-Gadda-Da-Vida, for short) or out of the garden (Out-A-Gadda-Da-Vida, for short)? Their attire suggests they&#039;re Out-A-Gadda-Da-Vida, so why is that tiger just chilling out there as they stroll past?
*Have you ever seen the 70s sitcom &quot;Good Times&quot;: the one where JJ paints a picture of &quot;black Jesus&quot; with Ned the wino as the model?  Did it influence your painting of Adam and Eve?
*Have you ever seen Bruce Almighty?  Did it influence your painting of Adam and Eve?
*Just when &lt;i&gt;did&lt;/i&gt; you do this painting?
*Have you done an Adam and Eve painting with bears?
*If Adam and Eve were our first parents and of one race, then from where did the different races come from?
*Are you under the assumption that Adam actually existed and that he was the first man?
*Do you agree with the following logic: Eve had very feathered hair.  Adam apparently shaved his legs.  That is embarrassing. Therefore, under a criterion of embarrassment, Adam and Eve must have existed. Q.E.D.?
*Isn&#039;t the combined meaning of Abraham 1:21-27 and Moses 7 that Ham&#039;s wife was of the seed of Cain?
*Okay, in the Moses account, all of Cain&#039;s seed are destroyed in the flood. So whatever Cain&#039;s seed were or were not, they have absolutely no relationship to any peoples in the world today.  Don&#039;t you believe in the worldwide flood, man?
*If Ham&#039;s wife is the seed of Cain and therefore bears the mark/curse (not that these two should be conflated, but we&#039;re working with the folk dotrine here!) and so some of the people on the ark are the descendents of Cain and therefore carry the curse/mark beyond the flood....if all of that is true (and we donâ€™t think it is), then how/why was Ham worthy enough to earn his ark ticket if he married one of these wicked, marked people? Or, the other way around: if these people were worthy to be on the ark, wouldn&#039;t it suggest that they were *not* wicked?
*Do you believe that Cain is Bigfoot?
*Do you agree that the subset of Bookcase people who view MoDo as a valid instructional manual is necessarily smaller than the total number of Bookcase people?
*Do you believe that Justin was just a little less righteous in the pre-existence than J. Stapley?
*Do you believe in pre-Adamites?
*Do you think that Ronan is a stranger in a strange land or a simply strange mate?
*Finally, do &lt;i&gt;you&lt;/i&gt; know who the boss is at BCC or the most interesting places to get ethnic food in Austin?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suggest a BCC interview with the artist of <i>Adam and Eve in the Garden</i>.</p>
<p>Some possible questions:</p>
<p>*Did you use models for the painting?<br />
*Were they a 30-something couple from Orem?  If so, do you think that there is anything wrong with that?<br />
*What is the theological significance of the fact that Adam and Eve both sported 80s hairdo&#8217;s and that Adam wore a miniskirt?<br />
*Are they wearing mini-skirts <i>or</i> deerskin kilts?<br />
*Why does Adam have darker skin than Eve?<br />
*Are Adam and Eve in the garden (In-A-Gadda-Da-Vida, for short) or out of the garden (Out-A-Gadda-Da-Vida, for short)? Their attire suggests they&#8217;re Out-A-Gadda-Da-Vida, so why is that tiger just chilling out there as they stroll past?<br />
*Have you ever seen the 70s sitcom &#8220;Good Times&#8221;: the one where JJ paints a picture of &#8220;black Jesus&#8221; with Ned the wino as the model?  Did it influence your painting of Adam and Eve?<br />
*Have you ever seen Bruce Almighty?  Did it influence your painting of Adam and Eve?<br />
*Just when <i>did</i> you do this painting?<br />
*Have you done an Adam and Eve painting with bears?<br />
*If Adam and Eve were our first parents and of one race, then from where did the different races come from?<br />
*Are you under the assumption that Adam actually existed and that he was the first man?<br />
*Do you agree with the following logic: Eve had very feathered hair.  Adam apparently shaved his legs.  That is embarrassing. Therefore, under a criterion of embarrassment, Adam and Eve must have existed. Q.E.D.?<br />
*Isn&#8217;t the combined meaning of Abraham 1:21-27 and Moses 7 that Ham&#8217;s wife was of the seed of Cain?<br />
*Okay, in the Moses account, all of Cain&#8217;s seed are destroyed in the flood. So whatever Cain&#8217;s seed were or were not, they have absolutely no relationship to any peoples in the world today.  Don&#8217;t you believe in the worldwide flood, man?<br />
*If Ham&#8217;s wife is the seed of Cain and therefore bears the mark/curse (not that these two should be conflated, but we&#8217;re working with the folk dotrine here!) and so some of the people on the ark are the descendents of Cain and therefore carry the curse/mark beyond the flood&#8230;.if all of that is true (and we donâ€™t think it is), then how/why was Ham worthy enough to earn his ark ticket if he married one of these wicked, marked people? Or, the other way around: if these people were worthy to be on the ark, wouldn&#8217;t it suggest that they were *not* wicked?<br />
*Do you believe that Cain is Bigfoot?<br />
*Do you agree that the subset of Bookcase people who view MoDo as a valid instructional manual is necessarily smaller than the total number of Bookcase people?<br />
*Do you believe that Justin was just a little less righteous in the pre-existence than J. Stapley?<br />
*Do you believe in pre-Adamites?<br />
*Do you think that Ronan is a stranger in a strange land or a simply strange mate?<br />
*Finally, do <i>you</i> know who the boss is at BCC or the most interesting places to get ethnic food in Austin?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

