<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The 1% Rule</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bycommonconsent.com/2006/07/25/the-1-rule/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bycommonconsent.com/2006/07/25/the-1-rule/</link>
	<description>A Mormon Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 20:12:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://bycommonconsent.com/2006/07/25/the-1-rule/#comment-32475</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2006 04:43:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bycommonconsent.com/2006/07/the-1-rule/#comment-32475</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I would say it&#039;s more like this:

5% create
15% interact
80% view and enjoy

A combination of the 80/20 rule, and the 95/5 rule.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would say it&#8217;s more like this:</p>
<p>5% create<br />
15% interact<br />
80% view and enjoy</p>
<p>A combination of the 80/20 rule, and the 95/5 rule.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J. Stapley</title>
		<link>http://bycommonconsent.com/2006/07/25/the-1-rule/#comment-32474</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[J. Stapley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2006 04:32:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bycommonconsent.com/2006/07/the-1-rule/#comment-32474</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, if it is any consideration Idahospud, now you know how the 1 percent feel when the post just sits there with no comments  :)

Really, that is a great comment and perspective.  Some of my favorite people around are &quot;lurkers&quot; and it is fun to have off-line discussions of the online content.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, if it is any consideration Idahospud, now you know how the 1 percent feel when the post just sits there with no comments  :)</p>
<p>Really, that is a great comment and perspective.  Some of my favorite people around are &#8220;lurkers&#8221; and it is fun to have off-line discussions of the online content.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Idahospud</title>
		<link>http://bycommonconsent.com/2006/07/25/the-1-rule/#comment-32473</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Idahospud]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2006 04:10:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bycommonconsent.com/2006/07/the-1-rule/#comment-32473</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sheesh.  My first time posting at BCC and I kill a thread.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sheesh.  My first time posting at BCC and I kill a thread.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Idahospud</title>
		<link>http://bycommonconsent.com/2006/07/25/the-1-rule/#comment-32472</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Idahospud]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2006 13:50:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bycommonconsent.com/2006/07/the-1-rule/#comment-32472</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interesting ideas--and I bet the numbers are pretty representative.  As a lurker who has been observing the Bloggernacle&#039;s evolution for over three years now, I know several other lurkers IRL with whom I discuss ideas, posts, and yes, the (online personas of)regular posters themselves.  Most of us are SAHMs who for one reason or another (mine is six kids, homeschooling, and online introversion) don&#039;t post regularly or at all.  This behind-the-scenes participation adds a whole new dimension/layer to your numbers; perhaps we are the quiet ones in SS who then apply the teachings anyway, or pass them along to those we visit teach?

 I met Julie Smith in person for the first time last week, while she was in Utah.  She is as funny, articulate, interesting, classy, and brilliant as she &quot;appears&quot; online. I had actually &quot;met&quot; her on a homeschooling message board a few years back when she was writing her book and before she even guest-posted at T&amp;S, and we&#039;ve had several email exchanges.  Even though she is among the 1% here and I am among the 89%, we were still able to discuss specific posts and ideas *in the celestial room of the Logan Temple*, no less.  I guess what I am saying is that those of us who are the 89% in the Bloggernacle are not necessarily passive onlookers, but participators in another, but just as real, sense--we take the things we learn from the 11%&#039;s exchange and discuss, dissect, and apply it in other, real-life fora.  To clarify, I&#039;m not saying that the 11% DON&#039;T apply the ideas, I&#039;m just saying that we can&#039;t assume that lurkers don&#039;t feel or act engaged, as well.  As one who takes a long time to put ideas to paper, I am impressed and mystified  how you 11% manage to maintain your level of participation day in and day out.  In fact, I think each blog&#039;s participants should post a &quot;day in the blogging life&quot; hourly play-by-play so the rest of us can see how you get it all done.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting ideas&#8211;and I bet the numbers are pretty representative.  As a lurker who has been observing the Bloggernacle&#8217;s evolution for over three years now, I know several other lurkers IRL with whom I discuss ideas, posts, and yes, the (online personas of)regular posters themselves.  Most of us are SAHMs who for one reason or another (mine is six kids, homeschooling, and online introversion) don&#8217;t post regularly or at all.  This behind-the-scenes participation adds a whole new dimension/layer to your numbers; perhaps we are the quiet ones in SS who then apply the teachings anyway, or pass them along to those we visit teach?</p>
<p> I met Julie Smith in person for the first time last week, while she was in Utah.  She is as funny, articulate, interesting, classy, and brilliant as she &#8220;appears&#8221; online. I had actually &#8220;met&#8221; her on a homeschooling message board a few years back when she was writing her book and before she even guest-posted at T&amp;S, and we&#8217;ve had several email exchanges.  Even though she is among the 1% here and I am among the 89%, we were still able to discuss specific posts and ideas *in the celestial room of the Logan Temple*, no less.  I guess what I am saying is that those of us who are the 89% in the Bloggernacle are not necessarily passive onlookers, but participators in another, but just as real, sense&#8211;we take the things we learn from the 11%&#8217;s exchange and discuss, dissect, and apply it in other, real-life fora.  To clarify, I&#8217;m not saying that the 11% DON&#8217;T apply the ideas, I&#8217;m just saying that we can&#8217;t assume that lurkers don&#8217;t feel or act engaged, as well.  As one who takes a long time to put ideas to paper, I am impressed and mystified  how you 11% manage to maintain your level of participation day in and day out.  In fact, I think each blog&#8217;s participants should post a &#8220;day in the blogging life&#8221; hourly play-by-play so the rest of us can see how you get it all done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blain</title>
		<link>http://bycommonconsent.com/2006/07/25/the-1-rule/#comment-32471</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Blain]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2006 05:15:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bycommonconsent.com/2006/07/the-1-rule/#comment-32471</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m not sure I&#039;m ready to get introspective about this Mormon blog thing.  It seems to be kinda like every other Mormon forum I&#039;ve been on, except that I think there might be more people reading and posting.

I don&#039;t think analogies comparing the Church to the set of blogs make much sense -- the Church actually accomplishes work, while posting, commenting and reading doesn&#039;t feed the hungry, clothe the naked, help the moving or provide jello and potatoes to funerals.  The amount of hours in a day are finite, and there comes a point where an hour on a blog is an hour less service to be rendered.  OTOH, an hour on a blog can also be an hour less TV watched, or an hour less porn viewed.

I don&#039;t think I&#039;m apt to get burned out.  If I don&#039;t have time to read blogs, I don&#039;t read them.  I&#039;ve found a few posts that were informative, but most of the ones such I&#039;m recalling come from Kevin and I&#039;ve already read them (or earlier versions of them at least).

I just come here for some interesting topics and a chance to talk about them with folks I haven&#039;t already talked to -- maybe to make a point somebody hasn&#039;t already heard, and to see somebody make a point I haven&#039;t already heard.  It&#039;s neither rocket science nor brain surgery, and it&#039;s not the hardest hitting place to hang out that I&#039;m on online.

It really is just another set of forums to me.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure I&#8217;m ready to get introspective about this Mormon blog thing.  It seems to be kinda like every other Mormon forum I&#8217;ve been on, except that I think there might be more people reading and posting.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think analogies comparing the Church to the set of blogs make much sense &#8212; the Church actually accomplishes work, while posting, commenting and reading doesn&#8217;t feed the hungry, clothe the naked, help the moving or provide jello and potatoes to funerals.  The amount of hours in a day are finite, and there comes a point where an hour on a blog is an hour less service to be rendered.  OTOH, an hour on a blog can also be an hour less TV watched, or an hour less porn viewed.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;m apt to get burned out.  If I don&#8217;t have time to read blogs, I don&#8217;t read them.  I&#8217;ve found a few posts that were informative, but most of the ones such I&#8217;m recalling come from Kevin and I&#8217;ve already read them (or earlier versions of them at least).</p>
<p>I just come here for some interesting topics and a chance to talk about them with folks I haven&#8217;t already talked to &#8212; maybe to make a point somebody hasn&#8217;t already heard, and to see somebody make a point I haven&#8217;t already heard.  It&#8217;s neither rocket science nor brain surgery, and it&#8217;s not the hardest hitting place to hang out that I&#8217;m on online.</p>
<p>It really is just another set of forums to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: annegb</title>
		<link>http://bycommonconsent.com/2006/07/25/the-1-rule/#comment-32470</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[annegb]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2006 01:44:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bycommonconsent.com/2006/07/the-1-rule/#comment-32470</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I always agree with everybody sometimes.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I always agree with everybody sometimes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary</title>
		<link>http://bycommonconsent.com/2006/07/25/the-1-rule/#comment-32469</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mary]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2006 20:01:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bycommonconsent.com/2006/07/the-1-rule/#comment-32469</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was thinking about this the other day in a related way.  At Church I am very outgoing and always helping, making comments, being annoying.  In the Bloggernacle, which I&#039;ve been participating in (for the most part just reading) since 2002, I very rarely &quot;speak.&quot;  I don&#039;t think I could stand myself if I was as outgoing in the Bloggernacle as I am in &quot;real&quot; Church.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was thinking about this the other day in a related way.  At Church I am very outgoing and always helping, making comments, being annoying.  In the Bloggernacle, which I&#8217;ve been participating in (for the most part just reading) since 2002, I very rarely &#8220;speak.&#8221;  I don&#8217;t think I could stand myself if I was as outgoing in the Bloggernacle as I am in &#8220;real&#8221; Church.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jjohnsen</title>
		<link>http://bycommonconsent.com/2006/07/25/the-1-rule/#comment-32468</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jjohnsen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2006 19:00:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bycommonconsent.com/2006/07/the-1-rule/#comment-32468</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ouch.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ouch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Evans</title>
		<link>http://bycommonconsent.com/2006/07/25/the-1-rule/#comment-32467</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve Evans]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2006 18:48:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bycommonconsent.com/2006/07/the-1-rule/#comment-32467</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[jjohnsen, you only need to utter the words &quot;I agree 100% with Ronan&quot; once if you want to feel foolish.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jjohnsen, you only need to utter the words &#8220;I agree 100% with Ronan&#8221; once if you want to feel foolish.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jjohnsen</title>
		<link>http://bycommonconsent.com/2006/07/25/the-1-rule/#comment-32466</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jjohnsen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2006 18:11:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bycommonconsent.com/2006/07/the-1-rule/#comment-32466</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I want to know how often the 1% checks each site they&#039;re commenting on?  By the time I&#039;ve hit various parts of the bloggernacle, the comments are pretty far into the topic and I don&#039;t feel I have anything new to contribute.  It only takes a few times submitting posts that consist of &quot;I agree 100% with what Ronan or Rusty said&quot; before I feel foolish.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I want to know how often the 1% checks each site they&#8217;re commenting on?  By the time I&#8217;ve hit various parts of the bloggernacle, the comments are pretty far into the topic and I don&#8217;t feel I have anything new to contribute.  It only takes a few times submitting posts that consist of &#8220;I agree 100% with what Ronan or Rusty said&#8221; before I feel foolish.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

