Do Mormon women hold the priesthood? For the majority of Latter-day Saints, the answer is an obvious no: women do not hold the priesthood. For me, the answer is an intellectually frustrating “maybe, yes, no, dunno.” In part, I have found Quinn’s research compelling: clearly there was some sense in the 19th century that temple-endowed Mormon women were part of the “priesthood” (see also J. Stapley’s thoughts). There’s also the rather practical realisation that if Mormon women can dress in the robes of the priesthood, wear the priesthood garment, and enact the rites of the priesthood, they are quite obviously “priests” (see Compton).
On the other hand, it is not clear to me that the 19th century use of the term “priesthood” has an equivalent in modern Mormonism (let alone in wider religious theory). Just because Mormon women could be members of an Anointed Quorum, for example, does not mean that they held the “priesthood” in any sense that would be meaningful for us today. Also, it’s rather obvious that priesthood or no, women are not ordained to priesthood office. For me, I believe there is “a priesthood” available to Mormon women, but I don’t quite know where to situate it and we would need an authorised clarification in order to better understand it.
One thing Quinn has written particularly catches my eye. He suggests that the lack of ordination of women, and the separation of Mormon womens’ “priesthood” from the bureaucratic function of the church may, in fact, be a useful thing: Read the rest of this entry »