<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: He&#8217;s not heavy, he&#8217;s my brother: community and public education</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bycommonconsent.com/2007/04/03/hes-not-heavy-hes-my-brother-community-and-public-education/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bycommonconsent.com/2007/04/03/hes-not-heavy-hes-my-brother-community-and-public-education/</link>
	<description>A Mormon Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 07:52:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: MCQ</title>
		<link>http://bycommonconsent.com/2007/04/03/hes-not-heavy-hes-my-brother-community-and-public-education/#comment-84192</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MCQ]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2007 08:49:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bycommonconsent.com/2007/04/hes-not-heavy-hes-my-brother-community-and-public-education/#comment-84192</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;The four whitest schools are Olympus, Skyline, Central and Cottonwood. I assume these are all regular public schools.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Why do we care which schools are the &quot;whitest?&quot;  As an Olympus alum, I think I&#039;m offended.  Who you callin&#039; &quot;white&quot; homey?

And you&#039;re wrong, Central is not a regular public school.

&lt;blockquote&gt;Central High School is just west of those three high schools. My husband thinks Central is the old Granite High around 7th East and 39th South.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Wrong, and um, so&#039;s your old man, twice.

&lt;blockquote&gt;Vouchers will not help poor parents because they do not provide enough money to make private school affordable. Itâ€™s a subsidy for middle and upper class families.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

That is correct, but I would add that even middle class families will find it difficult to afford most private school tuition on the voucher amount provided in this bill.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>The four whitest schools are Olympus, Skyline, Central and Cottonwood. I assume these are all regular public schools.</p></blockquote>
<p>Why do we care which schools are the &#8220;whitest?&#8221;  As an Olympus alum, I think I&#8217;m offended.  Who you callin&#8217; &#8220;white&#8221; homey?</p>
<p>And you&#8217;re wrong, Central is not a regular public school.</p>
<blockquote><p>Central High School is just west of those three high schools. My husband thinks Central is the old Granite High around 7th East and 39th South.</p></blockquote>
<p>Wrong, and um, so&#8217;s your old man, twice.</p>
<blockquote><p>Vouchers will not help poor parents because they do not provide enough money to make private school affordable. Itâ€™s a subsidy for middle and upper class families.</p></blockquote>
<p>That is correct, but I would add that even middle class families will find it difficult to afford most private school tuition on the voucher amount provided in this bill.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Evans</title>
		<link>http://bycommonconsent.com/2007/04/03/hes-not-heavy-hes-my-brother-community-and-public-education/#comment-84191</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt Evans]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2007 07:08:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bycommonconsent.com/2007/04/hes-not-heavy-hes-my-brother-community-and-public-education/#comment-84191</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;em&gt;Matt #26, you may have a point. The trick is in the implementation, and I believe that the current voucher approaches are a sufficiently wrongheaded implementation that they are immoral.

If you required private schools to accept all students regardless of how expensive they are to teach (the case with public schools now), you would have a point. &lt;/em&gt;

Sam, this doesn&#039;t make any sense.  My point was that vouchers function like Pell Grants.  Pell Grants don&#039;t cover tuition at most universities; at most schools it&#039;s only a minor subsidy.  Furthermore, Pell Grants and government loans are accepted at schools that *reject a majority of applicants.*

If you accept the morality of Pell Grants and government aid, even at universities that deny &quot;expensive&quot; students, is there any basis for opposing grants at the K-12 level?

Several commenters have said that it&#039;s the compulsory nature of K-10 education that&#039;s different (students can drop out at 16), but that&#039;s just a blanket anti-private and anti-home schooling argument. (Why let kids opt out of the public system when they&#039;re rich and dumb, but not when they&#039;re poor and smart?)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Matt #26, you may have a point. The trick is in the implementation, and I believe that the current voucher approaches are a sufficiently wrongheaded implementation that they are immoral.</p>
<p>If you required private schools to accept all students regardless of how expensive they are to teach (the case with public schools now), you would have a point. </em></p>
<p>Sam, this doesn&#8217;t make any sense.  My point was that vouchers function like Pell Grants.  Pell Grants don&#8217;t cover tuition at most universities; at most schools it&#8217;s only a minor subsidy.  Furthermore, Pell Grants and government loans are accepted at schools that *reject a majority of applicants.*</p>
<p>If you accept the morality of Pell Grants and government aid, even at universities that deny &#8220;expensive&#8221; students, is there any basis for opposing grants at the K-12 level?</p>
<p>Several commenters have said that it&#8217;s the compulsory nature of K-10 education that&#8217;s different (students can drop out at 16), but that&#8217;s just a blanket anti-private and anti-home schooling argument. (Why let kids opt out of the public system when they&#8217;re rich and dumb, but not when they&#8217;re poor and smart?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Evans</title>
		<link>http://bycommonconsent.com/2007/04/03/hes-not-heavy-hes-my-brother-community-and-public-education/#comment-84190</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt Evans]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2007 06:51:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bycommonconsent.com/2007/04/hes-not-heavy-hes-my-brother-community-and-public-education/#comment-84190</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Central High School is the &quot;alternative&quot; high school for Granite School District, which cuts an east-west swath across the Salt Lake Valley from Magna and Kearns to the east bench.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Central High School is the &#8220;alternative&#8221; high school for Granite School District, which cuts an east-west swath across the Salt Lake Valley from Magna and Kearns to the east bench.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carol F.</title>
		<link>http://bycommonconsent.com/2007/04/03/hes-not-heavy-hes-my-brother-community-and-public-education/#comment-84189</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Carol F.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2007 06:49:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bycommonconsent.com/2007/04/hes-not-heavy-hes-my-brother-community-and-public-education/#comment-84189</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From my experience (30 years observation in Arizona), charter schools are started because someone doesn&#039;t like what, how or with whom things are being taught at the public schools.  So, no, I think the numbers Dan quoted actually &lt;i&gt;hold up&lt;/i&gt; the theory that liberals are more against charter schools.  I think possibly the people in the conservative states mentioned don&#039;t start charters because what is being taught in the public schools is adequately close to what they want.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From my experience (30 years observation in Arizona), charter schools are started because someone doesn&#8217;t like what, how or with whom things are being taught at the public schools.  So, no, I think the numbers Dan quoted actually <i>hold up</i> the theory that liberals are more against charter schools.  I think possibly the people in the conservative states mentioned don&#8217;t start charters because what is being taught in the public schools is adequately close to what they want.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://bycommonconsent.com/2007/04/03/hes-not-heavy-hes-my-brother-community-and-public-education/#comment-84188</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2007 00:05:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bycommonconsent.com/2007/04/hes-not-heavy-hes-my-brother-community-and-public-education/#comment-84188</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Actually, I found some statistics. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.uscharterschools.org/cs/r/view/uscs_rs/2030&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;US Charter Schools has a PDF&lt;/a&gt; which shows the number of charter schools by state.

California has the most, of course: 625
Arizona 466 (this is the state that has really jumped on charter schools.

Massachusetts has 59
New York has 98
Texas has 269
Utah has 54

So generally speaking, &quot;liberal&quot; states seem to be allowing charter schools (with New York lagging). The most interesting numbers are from traditionally conservative states like Mississippi, Virginia, Wyoming, Tennessee, and Oklahoma.

Mississippi has 1
Virginia has 4
Wyoming has 3
Tennessee has 12
Oklahoma has 15

More:

Iowa has 7

What &quot;liberal&quot; state has the fewest? It seems Rhode Island does, with a mere 11 (though in comparison to Tennessee (12), Rhode Island has far more per capita.

Basically what I&#039;m saying is, can we stop taking swipes at liberals for supposedly being against charter schools?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, I found some statistics. <a href="http://www.uscharterschools.org/cs/r/view/uscs_rs/2030" rel="nofollow">US Charter Schools has a PDF</a> which shows the number of charter schools by state.</p>
<p>California has the most, of course: 625<br />
Arizona 466 (this is the state that has really jumped on charter schools.</p>
<p>Massachusetts has 59<br />
New York has 98<br />
Texas has 269<br />
Utah has 54</p>
<p>So generally speaking, &#8220;liberal&#8221; states seem to be allowing charter schools (with New York lagging). The most interesting numbers are from traditionally conservative states like Mississippi, Virginia, Wyoming, Tennessee, and Oklahoma.</p>
<p>Mississippi has 1<br />
Virginia has 4<br />
Wyoming has 3<br />
Tennessee has 12<br />
Oklahoma has 15</p>
<p>More:</p>
<p>Iowa has 7</p>
<p>What &#8220;liberal&#8221; state has the fewest? It seems Rhode Island does, with a mere 11 (though in comparison to Tennessee (12), Rhode Island has far more per capita.</p>
<p>Basically what I&#8217;m saying is, can we stop taking swipes at liberals for supposedly being against charter schools?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://bycommonconsent.com/2007/04/03/hes-not-heavy-hes-my-brother-community-and-public-education/#comment-84187</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 23:55:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bycommonconsent.com/2007/04/hes-not-heavy-hes-my-brother-community-and-public-education/#comment-84187</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Frank,

#69,

&lt;blockquote&gt;Lastly, states with lots of minorities (which tend to be Democratic) tend to heavily restrict charter schools, presumably due to pressure from teacherâ€™s unions. Thus individuals in minority groups tend to want charter schools, but they have trouble getting them thanks to all the liberals worrying about community and helping oneâ€™s brother.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Can you show evidence of this? I believe that Washington DC (which voted like 90% for Kerry in 2004) has the most charter schools per capita. I know Massachusetts, Rhode Island and California have a bunch as well.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Frank,</p>
<p>#69,</p>
<blockquote><p>Lastly, states with lots of minorities (which tend to be Democratic) tend to heavily restrict charter schools, presumably due to pressure from teacherâ€™s unions. Thus individuals in minority groups tend to want charter schools, but they have trouble getting them thanks to all the liberals worrying about community and helping oneâ€™s brother.</p></blockquote>
<p>Can you show evidence of this? I believe that Washington DC (which voted like 90% for Kerry in 2004) has the most charter schools per capita. I know Massachusetts, Rhode Island and California have a bunch as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carol F.</title>
		<link>http://bycommonconsent.com/2007/04/03/hes-not-heavy-hes-my-brother-community-and-public-education/#comment-84186</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Carol F.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 16:26:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bycommonconsent.com/2007/04/hes-not-heavy-hes-my-brother-community-and-public-education/#comment-84186</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Central High School is just west of those three high schools.  My husband thinks Central is the old Granite High around 7th East and 39th South.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Central High School is just west of those three high schools.  My husband thinks Central is the old Granite High around 7th East and 39th South.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carol F.</title>
		<link>http://bycommonconsent.com/2007/04/03/hes-not-heavy-hes-my-brother-community-and-public-education/#comment-84185</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Carol F.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 16:23:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bycommonconsent.com/2007/04/hes-not-heavy-hes-my-brother-community-and-public-education/#comment-84185</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Olympus, Skyline, and Cottonwood are all high schools along the East Bench of Salt Lake City.  Don&#039;t know about Central.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Olympus, Skyline, and Cottonwood are all high schools along the East Bench of Salt Lake City.  Don&#8217;t know about Central.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank McIntyre</title>
		<link>http://bycommonconsent.com/2007/04/03/hes-not-heavy-hes-my-brother-community-and-public-education/#comment-84184</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Frank McIntyre]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 16:08:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bycommonconsent.com/2007/04/hes-not-heavy-hes-my-brother-community-and-public-education/#comment-84184</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The four whitest schools are Olympus, Skyline, Central and Cottonwood.  I assume these are all regular public schools.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The four whitest schools are Olympus, Skyline, Central and Cottonwood.  I assume these are all regular public schools.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank McIntyre</title>
		<link>http://bycommonconsent.com/2007/04/03/hes-not-heavy-hes-my-brother-community-and-public-education/#comment-84183</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Frank McIntyre]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 16:02:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bycommonconsent.com/2007/04/hes-not-heavy-hes-my-brother-community-and-public-education/#comment-84183</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Those are interesting numbers, Sterling.

A caveat-- some charter/private schools  don&#039;t participate in the federal lunch program because they have no cafeteria, just a gym, thus the &quot;0% free or reduced...&quot; numbers for them are almost certainly because they are not reporting anything, rather than because they have no poor among them.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those are interesting numbers, Sterling.</p>
<p>A caveat&#8211; some charter/private schools  don&#8217;t participate in the federal lunch program because they have no cafeteria, just a gym, thus the &#8220;0% free or reduced&#8230;&#8221; numbers for them are almost certainly because they are not reporting anything, rather than because they have no poor among them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

