<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mitt Romney&#8217;s Prospects</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bycommonconsent.com/2007/09/18/mitt-romneys-prospects/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bycommonconsent.com/2007/09/18/mitt-romneys-prospects/</link>
	<description>A Mormon Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 May 2012 15:03:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: truebluethru'n'thru</title>
		<link>http://bycommonconsent.com/2007/09/18/mitt-romneys-prospects/#comment-102033</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[truebluethru'n'thru]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 14:51:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bycommonconsent.com/2007/09/mitt-romneys-prospects/#comment-102033</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The RealClearPolitics polls-average for November 1 through 12 has Guiliani leading by 13.2.

Guili 29.3
Thomp 16.1
&quot;Mc&quot;- 14.3
Rom - 13.6
Huck - 8.3
Paulie 4.3]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The RealClearPolitics polls-average for November 1 through 12 has Guiliani leading by 13.2.</p>
<p>Guili 29.3<br />
Thomp 16.1<br />
&#8220;Mc&#8221;- 14.3<br />
Rom &#8211; 13.6<br />
Huck &#8211; 8.3<br />
Paulie 4.3</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: truebluethru'n'thru</title>
		<link>http://bycommonconsent.com/2007/09/18/mitt-romneys-prospects/#comment-102032</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[truebluethru'n'thru]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 14:09:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bycommonconsent.com/2007/09/mitt-romneys-prospects/#comment-102032</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[edits - Taft was the LAST commander in chief with whiskers, Lincoln the FIRST]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>edits &#8211; Taft was the LAST commander in chief with whiskers, Lincoln the FIRST</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: truebluethru'n'thru</title>
		<link>http://bycommonconsent.com/2007/09/18/mitt-romneys-prospects/#comment-102031</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[truebluethru'n'thru]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 14:06:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bycommonconsent.com/2007/09/mitt-romneys-prospects/#comment-102031</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Translation: I say Thompson learns his lines well enough that he remains viable (/&quot;becomes viable again&quot; in the media&#039;s eyes).

But, if it actually &lt;i&gt;does&lt;/i&gt; turn out to be Mitt who is (/&quot;becomes&quot;) the Not Rudy candidate in the social conservatives&#039; eyes, then all bets are off (and Roasted tee&#039;s analysis is a &quot;but&quot; that&#039;s amazingly been answered?)

* * *
Extra credit. If Mitt &lt;i&gt;does&lt;/i&gt; become POTUS then it will then become the style for a while to come for presidents to be MBAs that say Golly Gee: As, remember that the example of the non-balding, youthful Kennedy--our first Catholic POTUS, who did away with the style/standard of formality of hats-wearing for men!

But whenever this style of politicos goes out of sytle, the very next POTUS will have a close-cropped goatee. (Note that the last specifically &quot;non-Christian&quot; president was Teddy&#039;s Progressive protege, Wm Taft--who was not only the last Unitarian prez of the United States but who had turned down an Ivy League university&#039;s presidency due his dis-belief in Christ. And Taft was the  prez with whiskers.  Then, the first rather- overtly-agnostic prez of the United States was Lincoln (although he was said to have converted on his death bed). And Lincoln had been the  Commander in Cheif with facial hair.)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Translation: I say Thompson learns his lines well enough that he remains viable (/&#8221;becomes viable again&#8221; in the media&#8217;s eyes).</p>
<p>But, if it actually <i>does</i> turn out to be Mitt who is (/&#8221;becomes&#8221;) the Not Rudy candidate in the social conservatives&#8217; eyes, then all bets are off (and Roasted tee&#8217;s analysis is a &#8220;but&#8221; that&#8217;s amazingly been answered?)</p>
<p>* * *<br />
Extra credit. If Mitt <i>does</i> become POTUS then it will then become the style for a while to come for presidents to be MBAs that say Golly Gee: As, remember that the example of the non-balding, youthful Kennedy&#8211;our first Catholic POTUS, who did away with the style/standard of formality of hats-wearing for men!</p>
<p>But whenever this style of politicos goes out of sytle, the very next POTUS will have a close-cropped goatee. (Note that the last specifically &#8220;non-Christian&#8221; president was Teddy&#8217;s Progressive protege, Wm Taft&#8211;who was not only the last Unitarian prez of the United States but who had turned down an Ivy League university&#8217;s presidency due his dis-belief in Christ. And Taft was the  prez with whiskers.  Then, the first rather- overtly-agnostic prez of the United States was Lincoln (although he was said to have converted on his death bed). And Lincoln had been the  Commander in Cheif with facial hair.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: truebluethru'n'thru</title>
		<link>http://bycommonconsent.com/2007/09/18/mitt-romneys-prospects/#comment-102030</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[truebluethru'n'thru]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 05:51:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bycommonconsent.com/2007/09/mitt-romneys-prospects/#comment-102030</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What I mean is, if I rewrote the above (&lt;i&gt;commentator&lt;/i&gt; instead of &lt;i&gt;commenter,&lt;/i&gt; etc. etc.) would it get a passing C in a poly sci class?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I mean is, if I rewrote the above (<i>commentator</i> instead of <i>commenter,</i> etc. etc.) would it get a passing C in a poly sci class?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: truebluethru'n'thru</title>
		<link>http://bycommonconsent.com/2007/09/18/mitt-romneys-prospects/#comment-102029</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[truebluethru'n'thru]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 05:42:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bycommonconsent.com/2007/09/mitt-romneys-prospects/#comment-102029</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As a student of what the Internet&#039;s political commenters (including Roasted tee) says, I&#039;ve come up with this:

Mitt = the guy hitting the ceiling this string has discussed?

While &quot;no money&quot; Mike = early states&#039; flash in the pan?

However, the likewise folksy) &lt;i&gt;&quot;He&#039;s one of us!&quot;&lt;/i&gt; Freddy, as social conservatives&#039; hoped-for &quot;savior,&quot; who is now (literally) &quot;performing&quot; better on the stump, &lt;i&gt;has&lt;/i&gt; cha-ching money that maybe makes for well-wrought commercials that will = big states&#039; momentum on election day among social conservatives?

Nonetheless, while Fred&#039;s enough of a dreamer to run, maybe he&#039;s enough of a realist to know he doesn&#039;t really stand a chance. Which brings us to Rudy, who is, of course, so many Republican voters&#039; not only 1st but 2nd choice. Yet, also, the &quot;student body elections&quot; fact is that Rudy is Freddy&#039;s collegial friend. And...&lt;i&gt;[looks side to side, then whispers]...should Rudy makes a deal for Fred to, starting now, go all negative all the time on Mitt, well...hmmm...!&lt;/i&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a student of what the Internet&#8217;s political commenters (including Roasted tee) says, I&#8217;ve come up with this:</p>
<p>Mitt = the guy hitting the ceiling this string has discussed?</p>
<p>While &#8220;no money&#8221; Mike = early states&#8217; flash in the pan?</p>
<p>However, the likewise folksy) <i>&#8220;He&#8217;s one of us!&#8221;</i> Freddy, as social conservatives&#8217; hoped-for &#8220;savior,&#8221; who is now (literally) &#8220;performing&#8221; better on the stump, <i>has</i> cha-ching money that maybe makes for well-wrought commercials that will = big states&#8217; momentum on election day among social conservatives?</p>
<p>Nonetheless, while Fred&#8217;s enough of a dreamer to run, maybe he&#8217;s enough of a realist to know he doesn&#8217;t really stand a chance. Which brings us to Rudy, who is, of course, so many Republican voters&#8217; not only 1st but 2nd choice. Yet, also, the &#8220;student body elections&#8221; fact is that Rudy is Freddy&#8217;s collegial friend. And&#8230;<i>[looks side to side, then whispers]&#8230;should Rudy makes a deal for Fred to, starting now, go all negative all the time on Mitt, well&#8230;hmmm&#8230;!</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David T.</title>
		<link>http://bycommonconsent.com/2007/09/18/mitt-romneys-prospects/#comment-102024</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David T.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 16:08:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bycommonconsent.com/2007/09/mitt-romneys-prospects/#comment-102024</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A pronounced rift is certainly cutting through the evangelical fabric. Lo here and lo there. Considering Robertson&#039;s historical differences with Giuliani, it makes one wonder what the dominant factor that caused him to cast his lot (Damn, I&#039;m waxing scriptural this morning).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A pronounced rift is certainly cutting through the evangelical fabric. Lo here and lo there. Considering Robertson&#8217;s historical differences with Giuliani, it makes one wonder what the dominant factor that caused him to cast his lot (Damn, I&#8217;m waxing scriptural this morning).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: truebluethru'n'thru</title>
		<link>http://bycommonconsent.com/2007/09/18/mitt-romneys-prospects/#comment-102028</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[truebluethru'n'thru]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 07:49:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bycommonconsent.com/2007/09/mitt-romneys-prospects/#comment-102028</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think Rudy scored such a very important coup yesterday with his endorsement yesterday from religious broadcaster/one-time presidential candidate Pat Robertson. There&#039;s blog talk excoriating Robertson for it, noting Robertson&#039;s history of strangely hyberbolic statements, so we&#039;ll see.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Rudy scored such a very important coup yesterday with his endorsement yesterday from religious broadcaster/one-time presidential candidate Pat Robertson. There&#8217;s blog talk excoriating Robertson for it, noting Robertson&#8217;s history of strangely hyberbolic statements, so we&#8217;ll see.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: California Condor</title>
		<link>http://bycommonconsent.com/2007/09/18/mitt-romneys-prospects/#comment-102027</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[California Condor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 23:17:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bycommonconsent.com/2007/09/mitt-romneys-prospects/#comment-102027</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Romney knows what he is doing.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Romney knows what he is doing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: truebluethru'n'thru</title>
		<link>http://bycommonconsent.com/2007/09/18/mitt-romneys-prospects/#comment-102026</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[truebluethru'n'thru]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 20:52:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bycommonconsent.com/2007/09/mitt-romneys-prospects/#comment-102026</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;&quot;Election 2008: South Carolina Republican Primary: Thompson 24% Giuliani 20%&quot;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt; September 30

&quot;[...T]he latest Rasmussen Reports telephone survey finds Fred Thompson leading Rudy Giuliani 24% to 20%.... Mitt Romney has moved into third place and is now supported by 15% of South Carolina’s Likely Primary Voters while John McCain is barely in double digits at 11% support. Former Arkansas Governor Mike Huckabee earns 3% of the South Carolina vote while four other candidates split 5% and 22% are undecided.&quot;

&lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;&quot;South Carolina Republican Primary&quot;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (Real Clear Politics) Sep 5--Oct 2 poll-of-polls
----------------------- %
Thompson - 20.3
Giuliani ------ 20.5
Romney ----- 16.5
McCain ------ 14.3
Huckabee --- 5.3]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i><b>&#8220;Election 2008: South Carolina Republican Primary: Thompson 24% Giuliani 20%&#8221;</b></i> September 30</p>
<p>&#8220;[...T]he latest Rasmussen Reports telephone survey finds Fred Thompson leading Rudy Giuliani 24% to 20%&#8230;. Mitt Romney has moved into third place and is now supported by 15% of South Carolina’s Likely Primary Voters while John McCain is barely in double digits at 11% support. Former Arkansas Governor Mike Huckabee earns 3% of the South Carolina vote while four other candidates split 5% and 22% are undecided.&#8221;</p>
<p><b><i>&#8220;South Carolina Republican Primary&#8221;</i></b> (Real Clear Politics) Sep 5&#8211;Oct 2 poll-of-polls<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211; %<br />
Thompson &#8211; 20.3<br />
Giuliani &#8212;&#8212; 20.5<br />
Romney &#8212;&#8211; 16.5<br />
McCain &#8212;&#8212; 14.3<br />
Huckabee &#8212; 5.3</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: truebluethru'n'thru</title>
		<link>http://bycommonconsent.com/2007/09/18/mitt-romneys-prospects/#comment-102025</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[truebluethru'n'thru]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 19:38:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bycommonconsent.com/2007/09/mitt-romneys-prospects/#comment-102025</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt;&quot;Political markets see Clinton vs Giuliani contest&quot;&lt;/i&gt; by David Alexander (Reuters) October 29

&quot;WASHINGTON - Traders on the Iowa Electronic Markets [...recently] gave Clinton, the senator and former first lady, a 70 percent chance of winning the Democratic nomination.... Giuliani, the former New York City mayor, had a 40 percent shot at the Republican nomination, versus a 31.5 percent chance for former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney.

&quot;&#039;It&#039;s not like you look in the magic crystal ball and you can see what&#039;s going to happen,&#039; said [Joyce Berg, of the &lt;i&gt;Iowa markets board.&lt;/i&gt;] &#039;It&#039;s pulling together all the available information that&#039;s out there, saying ... this is what we think....&#039;

&quot;[Trading on] &lt;i&gt;Intrade,&lt;/i&gt; the Dublin-based firm that claims to be the largest political prediction market [...has] produced numbers similar to those from Iowa.... John Delaney, the chief executive of Intrade, said the similar results are a sign the markets are trading on the same information....&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>&#8220;Political markets see Clinton vs Giuliani contest&#8221;</i> by David Alexander (Reuters) October 29</p>
<p>&#8220;WASHINGTON &#8211; Traders on the Iowa Electronic Markets [...recently] gave Clinton, the senator and former first lady, a 70 percent chance of winning the Democratic nomination&#8230;. Giuliani, the former New York City mayor, had a 40 percent shot at the Republican nomination, versus a 31.5 percent chance for former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney.</p>
<p>&#8220;&#8216;It&#8217;s not like you look in the magic crystal ball and you can see what&#8217;s going to happen,&#8217; said [Joyce Berg, of the <i>Iowa markets board.</i>] &#8216;It&#8217;s pulling together all the available information that&#8217;s out there, saying &#8230; this is what we think&#8230;.&#8217;</p>
<p>&#8220;[Trading on] <i>Intrade,</i> the Dublin-based firm that claims to be the largest political prediction market [...has] produced numbers similar to those from Iowa&#8230;. John Delaney, the chief executive of Intrade, said the similar results are a sign the markets are trading on the same information&#8230;.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

