<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sorry, Michael, but you&#8217;re telling porkies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bycommonconsent.com/2007/12/12/sorry-michael-but-youre-telling-porkies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bycommonconsent.com/2007/12/12/sorry-michael-but-youre-telling-porkies/</link>
	<description>A Mormon Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 May 2012 20:53:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hellmut</title>
		<link>http://bycommonconsent.com/2007/12/12/sorry-michael-but-youre-telling-porkies/#comment-56794</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hellmut]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2007 05:22:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bycommonconsent.com/2007/12/sorry-michael-but-youre-telling-porkies/#comment-56794</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[John C. is right that the evangelical vote is more essential to the Republican coalition than Mormons because there are so many more of them than us.

On the other hand, without the Mormon vote Republicans cannot carry swing states such as Arizona and Nevada.  A careful voter analysis could probably identify a couple of other states that would become unwinable to Republican candidates without overwhelming support from Mormon voters: New Mexico and Colorado, for example, and may be even states such as Florida or Ohio.

OK, the last two examples are stretching it but the fact remains that the Mormon vote is essential to the coalition of alienated white males that constitutes the Republican party&#039;s base.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John C. is right that the evangelical vote is more essential to the Republican coalition than Mormons because there are so many more of them than us.</p>
<p>On the other hand, without the Mormon vote Republicans cannot carry swing states such as Arizona and Nevada.  A careful voter analysis could probably identify a couple of other states that would become unwinable to Republican candidates without overwhelming support from Mormon voters: New Mexico and Colorado, for example, and may be even states such as Florida or Ohio.</p>
<p>OK, the last two examples are stretching it but the fact remains that the Mormon vote is essential to the coalition of alienated white males that constitutes the Republican party&#8217;s base.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andres</title>
		<link>http://bycommonconsent.com/2007/12/12/sorry-michael-but-youre-telling-porkies/#comment-56793</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andres]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 17:40:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bycommonconsent.com/2007/12/sorry-michael-but-youre-telling-porkies/#comment-56793</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today liberal blogger Juan Cole came out against Huck&#039;s comment.  He even posted the full text of an apologetic article that explains the &quot;Jesus brother of Satan&quot; idea - this has got to be a first for the liberal blogosphere...

see link here:

http://www.juancole.com/2007/12/ayatollah-huckabees-fatwa.html#comments]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today liberal blogger Juan Cole came out against Huck&#8217;s comment.  He even posted the full text of an apologetic article that explains the &#8220;Jesus brother of Satan&#8221; idea &#8211; this has got to be a first for the liberal blogosphere&#8230;</p>
<p>see link here:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.juancole.com/2007/12/ayatollah-huckabees-fatwa.html#comments" rel="nofollow">http://www.juancole.com/2007/12/ayatollah-huckabees-fatwa.html#comments</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kurt</title>
		<link>http://bycommonconsent.com/2007/12/12/sorry-michael-but-youre-telling-porkies/#comment-56792</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kurt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 17:16:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bycommonconsent.com/2007/12/sorry-michael-but-youre-telling-porkies/#comment-56792</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Seriously though, is “Mormons believe Jesus and Satan are brothers” evangelical code for “Mormons are Satanists?”  If it is, would Huckabee’s comment sound as innocent if he came right out and said “is it true Mormons worship Lucifer?”?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seriously though, is “Mormons believe Jesus and Satan are brothers” evangelical code for “Mormons are Satanists?”  If it is, would Huckabee’s comment sound as innocent if he came right out and said “is it true Mormons worship Lucifer?”?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kurt</title>
		<link>http://bycommonconsent.com/2007/12/12/sorry-michael-but-youre-telling-porkies/#comment-56791</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kurt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 17:04:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bycommonconsent.com/2007/12/sorry-michael-but-youre-telling-porkies/#comment-56791</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Absolutely not!  I&#039;m an Ozzie purist.  And I like Van Halen - not Van Haggar.  We should at least get that doctrine clear before anyone tries to join my new church.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Absolutely not!  I&#8217;m an Ozzie purist.  And I like Van Halen &#8211; not Van Haggar.  We should at least get that doctrine clear before anyone tries to join my new church.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AH</title>
		<link>http://bycommonconsent.com/2007/12/12/sorry-michael-but-youre-telling-porkies/#comment-56790</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AH]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 16:50:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bycommonconsent.com/2007/12/sorry-michael-but-youre-telling-porkies/#comment-56790</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;Now that I know I’m a Satanist, I can skip sacrament meeting on Sunday and just stay home and listen to my old Black Sabbath albums.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Here&#039;s the important question though, would that include the &#039;Dio&#039; years when he was fronting Sabs?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Now that I know I’m a Satanist, I can skip sacrament meeting on Sunday and just stay home and listen to my old Black Sabbath albums.</p></blockquote>
<p>Here&#8217;s the important question though, would that include the &#8216;Dio&#8217; years when he was fronting Sabs?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kurt</title>
		<link>http://bycommonconsent.com/2007/12/12/sorry-michael-but-youre-telling-porkies/#comment-56733</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kurt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 10:24:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bycommonconsent.com/2007/12/sorry-michael-but-youre-telling-porkies/#comment-56733</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;However, for Evangelicals who believe that Jesus is co-eternal and consubstantial with the Father, and we’re all just Creatures, saying that Satan is Jesus’ brother is almost equivalent to saying “Mormons believe that Satan is a deity!”&quot;

I always wondered why anti-Mormons got their panties in such a knot about the Jesus-brother thing.  I guess I never realized this was just a back handed way of calling us Devil-worshipers.

Now that I know I&#039;m a Satanist, I can skip sacrament meeting on Sunday and just stay home and listen to my old Black Sabbath albums.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;However, for Evangelicals who believe that Jesus is co-eternal and consubstantial with the Father, and we’re all just Creatures, saying that Satan is Jesus’ brother is almost equivalent to saying “Mormons believe that Satan is a deity!”&#8221;</p>
<p>I always wondered why anti-Mormons got their panties in such a knot about the Jesus-brother thing.  I guess I never realized this was just a back handed way of calling us Devil-worshipers.</p>
<p>Now that I know I&#8217;m a Satanist, I can skip sacrament meeting on Sunday and just stay home and listen to my old Black Sabbath albums.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray</title>
		<link>http://bycommonconsent.com/2007/12/12/sorry-michael-but-youre-telling-porkies/#comment-56789</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ray]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 02:47:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bycommonconsent.com/2007/12/sorry-michael-but-youre-telling-porkies/#comment-56789</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;only like minded people welcome here?&quot;

I can&#039;t stop laughing long enough to type a coherent response.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;only like minded people welcome here?&#8221;</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t stop laughing long enough to type a coherent response.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray</title>
		<link>http://bycommonconsent.com/2007/12/12/sorry-michael-but-youre-telling-porkies/#comment-56788</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ray]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 02:09:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bycommonconsent.com/2007/12/sorry-michael-but-youre-telling-porkies/#comment-56788</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At least you have to admire his dedication - ok, even I don&#039;t believe that.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At least you have to admire his dedication &#8211; ok, even I don&#8217;t believe that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Margaret Young</title>
		<link>http://bycommonconsent.com/2007/12/12/sorry-michael-but-youre-telling-porkies/#comment-56787</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Margaret Young]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 02:06:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bycommonconsent.com/2007/12/sorry-michael-but-youre-telling-porkies/#comment-56787</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Did somebody leave the &quot;Welcome trolls&quot; sign up?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did somebody leave the &#8220;Welcome trolls&#8221; sign up?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Evans</title>
		<link>http://bycommonconsent.com/2007/12/12/sorry-michael-but-youre-telling-porkies/#comment-56786</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve Evans]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 01:39:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bycommonconsent.com/2007/12/sorry-michael-but-youre-telling-porkies/#comment-56786</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[gst, others can provide you better advice than I, but I&#039;d suggest that you ease into it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>gst, others can provide you better advice than I, but I&#8217;d suggest that you ease into it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

