<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: If you lose your faith&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bycommonconsent.com/2008/02/29/if-you-lose-your-faith/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bycommonconsent.com/2008/02/29/if-you-lose-your-faith/</link>
	<description>A Mormon Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 20:38:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John C.</title>
		<link>http://bycommonconsent.com/2008/02/29/if-you-lose-your-faith/#comment-112642</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John C.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 21:52:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bycommonconsent.com/2008/02/if-you-lose-your-faith/#comment-112642</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Okay folks.  We&#039;ve touched a nerve.  Lots of ink spilt.  Faith is clearly complex, involving conscious decision making, unconscious emotional data, and events external to ourselves.  It may be a mistake to emphasize one aspect over another; however, only one of those aspects is within one&#039;s conscious control.  This may be a case of agreeing to disagree here; in any case, this is as far as we can go with it here.  Thanks for the discussion, all.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay folks.  We&#8217;ve touched a nerve.  Lots of ink spilt.  Faith is clearly complex, involving conscious decision making, unconscious emotional data, and events external to ourselves.  It may be a mistake to emphasize one aspect over another; however, only one of those aspects is within one&#8217;s conscious control.  This may be a case of agreeing to disagree here; in any case, this is as far as we can go with it here.  Thanks for the discussion, all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray</title>
		<link>http://bycommonconsent.com/2008/02/29/if-you-lose-your-faith/#comment-112641</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ray]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 21:31:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bycommonconsent.com/2008/02/if-you-lose-your-faith/#comment-112641</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[#195 - bookwormmomma: Fwiw, part of my testimony is due to my study of other theologies and religions.  Frankly, I don&#039;t *desire to believe* any of them like I *desire to believe* this one.  It really is what I want, so I&#039;ve chosen consciously (I think - *grin*) to pursue a deeper understanding of it - to reconcile what I can reconcile and gnaw on what I can&#039;t reconcile for now.  It works for me.

It also has given me a bit of perspective on &quot;the alternatives&quot; - again, enough to realize that I just don&#039;t want them.  They won&#039;t give me any more joy in the here and now than I already have, and they don&#039;t give me the hope for a continuation eternally of what brings me joy in the here and now.  I feel what I believe is true; I want it to be true; I don&#039;t want any other &quot;truth&quot;; so I accept the difficulties inherent in the history as a natural result of mortality and pursue the joy I want and for which I hope.

To me, that&#039;s a conscious choice - as others have said, not necessarily as to what I hear or read or feel but as to what I do with it.  Even if I am wrong in that (even if I don&#039;t choose nearly as much as I think I do), my belief in the nature of the Atonement covers that potential wrongness, so I just don&#039;t spend much emotional capital worrying about it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#195 &#8211; bookwormmomma: Fwiw, part of my testimony is due to my study of other theologies and religions.  Frankly, I don&#8217;t *desire to believe* any of them like I *desire to believe* this one.  It really is what I want, so I&#8217;ve chosen consciously (I think &#8211; *grin*) to pursue a deeper understanding of it &#8211; to reconcile what I can reconcile and gnaw on what I can&#8217;t reconcile for now.  It works for me.</p>
<p>It also has given me a bit of perspective on &#8220;the alternatives&#8221; &#8211; again, enough to realize that I just don&#8217;t want them.  They won&#8217;t give me any more joy in the here and now than I already have, and they don&#8217;t give me the hope for a continuation eternally of what brings me joy in the here and now.  I feel what I believe is true; I want it to be true; I don&#8217;t want any other &#8220;truth&#8221;; so I accept the difficulties inherent in the history as a natural result of mortality and pursue the joy I want and for which I hope.</p>
<p>To me, that&#8217;s a conscious choice &#8211; as others have said, not necessarily as to what I hear or read or feel but as to what I do with it.  Even if I am wrong in that (even if I don&#8217;t choose nearly as much as I think I do), my belief in the nature of the Atonement covers that potential wrongness, so I just don&#8217;t spend much emotional capital worrying about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bookwormmama</title>
		<link>http://bycommonconsent.com/2008/02/29/if-you-lose-your-faith/#comment-112640</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bookwormmama]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 20:56:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bycommonconsent.com/2008/02/if-you-lose-your-faith/#comment-112640</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No worries...it&#039;s no big deal...:]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No worries&#8230;it&#8217;s no big deal&#8230;:]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh Smith</title>
		<link>http://bycommonconsent.com/2008/02/29/if-you-lose-your-faith/#comment-112639</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Josh Smith]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 20:45:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bycommonconsent.com/2008/02/if-you-lose-your-faith/#comment-112639</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bookwormmomma,

Again, I&#039;m sorry I misread your post. I&#039;ve read it over four or five times now and there&#039;s no reason I should have misread it. I&#039;m sorry.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bookwormmomma,</p>
<p>Again, I&#8217;m sorry I misread your post. I&#8217;ve read it over four or five times now and there&#8217;s no reason I should have misread it. I&#8217;m sorry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bookwormmama</title>
		<link>http://bycommonconsent.com/2008/02/29/if-you-lose-your-faith/#comment-112638</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bookwormmama]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 20:43:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bycommonconsent.com/2008/02/if-you-lose-your-faith/#comment-112638</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ray, I just wanted to say that a lot of what you seem to say makes sense... I agree that there is a possibility that because I was born and raised in the church and never given an opportunity to learn about or be exposed to other ways of thinking without being taught that they were all &quot;wrong&quot; could definitely have skewed my own perceptions now and could affect my own search and personal beliefs now.
I agree with your comment on #188. There is a possibility that I have never had faith to begin with... just a religion that I didn&#039;t pick and doctrine that I didn&#039;t choose for myself. I was born into it. I didn&#039;t search for it.I can&#039;t say for certain whether I would have joined the church on my own if I wasn&#039;t born into it... the reason I stay now is for family...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ray, I just wanted to say that a lot of what you seem to say makes sense&#8230; I agree that there is a possibility that because I was born and raised in the church and never given an opportunity to learn about or be exposed to other ways of thinking without being taught that they were all &#8220;wrong&#8221; could definitely have skewed my own perceptions now and could affect my own search and personal beliefs now.<br />
I agree with your comment on #188. There is a possibility that I have never had faith to begin with&#8230; just a religion that I didn&#8217;t pick and doctrine that I didn&#8217;t choose for myself. I was born into it. I didn&#8217;t search for it.I can&#8217;t say for certain whether I would have joined the church on my own if I wasn&#8217;t born into it&#8230; the reason I stay now is for family&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J. Nelson-Seawright</title>
		<link>http://bycommonconsent.com/2008/02/29/if-you-lose-your-faith/#comment-112637</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[J. Nelson-Seawright]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 20:42:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bycommonconsent.com/2008/02/if-you-lose-your-faith/#comment-112637</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Who?, you&#039;re a prince.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who?, you&#8217;re a prince.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J. Nelson-Seawright</title>
		<link>http://bycommonconsent.com/2008/02/29/if-you-lose-your-faith/#comment-112636</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[J. Nelson-Seawright]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 20:35:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bycommonconsent.com/2008/02/if-you-lose-your-faith/#comment-112636</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oops.  I should say cold vs. hot cognition.  It&#039;s the distinction between the emotional subsystems that we don&#039;t consciously control and the analytic ones that we do.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oops.  I should say cold vs. hot cognition.  It&#8217;s the distinction between the emotional subsystems that we don&#8217;t consciously control and the analytic ones that we do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Parkin</title>
		<link>http://bycommonconsent.com/2008/02/29/if-you-lose-your-faith/#comment-112635</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Thomas Parkin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 20:35:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bycommonconsent.com/2008/02/if-you-lose-your-faith/#comment-112635</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[First off, I think choice is problematic. Not that we don&#039;t choose, but knowing where our choices come from ... where do our thoughts come from? Observe yourself thinking. We do not will our thoughts into being. They come to us. And, in so far as I can observe myself choosing, my choices come from that same place. Something in me may be free, and it may be choosing and willing - and that thing may in fact be me (what else would it be?).

Anyway, there is lot more to it than waking up one morning and saying &#039;I choose to have faith&#039; or &#039;I choose to no longer have faith.&#039;

I recognize that I both chose to leave the church, then chose to come back. In fact, even though there were many factors, my varying choices being factors, many moments of varying color that lead to both, there were in fact decisive moments in each &#039;choice&#039; that were definitive. I could describe both moments. Neither was in and of itself a matter of choosing whether to have faith or not. Rather, I chose to act based on where I beleived I&#039;d find happiness and freedom. I never really lost my faith in the church - for some reason the things that seem to trouble people about the church have never troubled me. But I did lose faith in the ability of the gospel to make me happy and free. I thought I&#039;d find freedom in chooisng an identity: in creating myself, or, in a kind of Nietzchean way, being myself. And then, over time and after a LOT of difficulty and soul searching, and making myself and other people miserable, and close observation of myself and the people around me, and contrasting it to those few Mormons I knew understood and lived their religion - I began to find my faith again.

What I do think is that we can choose, day to day, even moment to moment, to think and, more importantly, act in ways that will strengthen or loosen our faith. Certain things we do bring the Spirit into our lives. At some point we may have to choose those things over things we temporarily love better. And that is very very difficult. It may be more difficult for some than for others -right, some have ten talents, some five, some one - we do not begin on equal footing. But consistant prayer, honest, searching and humble scripture study, a willingness to sacrifice, especially the willingness to sacrifice one&#039;s worldly identity (the honors of men), in short living the gospel, which can very nearly be _defined_ as a mode of searching, will lead any person to the same _ultimate_ conclusions. We will grow from grace to grace.

Well, if we love better the voice of our totem jaguar spirit, or whatehaveyou, that will lead us to a different place. Those who find their lives lose it - those who lose thier lives, for Christ&#039;s sake, will find it. I found that the most hateful scripture. Right along with the scripture that says that no man seeks for the Lord or His righteousness, but walks in his own way, after the image of his own god, which is in the image of the world. I personally wanted to be Lord Byron. Some other person might want something less dramatic - to be a success in some profession, or in the eyes of some people. Or when Pres Benson said that unless the roots of our faith go deep into the gospel as it is taught in the BoM in the heat of the day it will wither and die. I really hated all that stuff. It turned to be so, all the same.

~]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First off, I think choice is problematic. Not that we don&#8217;t choose, but knowing where our choices come from &#8230; where do our thoughts come from? Observe yourself thinking. We do not will our thoughts into being. They come to us. And, in so far as I can observe myself choosing, my choices come from that same place. Something in me may be free, and it may be choosing and willing &#8211; and that thing may in fact be me (what else would it be?).</p>
<p>Anyway, there is lot more to it than waking up one morning and saying &#8216;I choose to have faith&#8217; or &#8216;I choose to no longer have faith.&#8217;</p>
<p>I recognize that I both chose to leave the church, then chose to come back. In fact, even though there were many factors, my varying choices being factors, many moments of varying color that lead to both, there were in fact decisive moments in each &#8216;choice&#8217; that were definitive. I could describe both moments. Neither was in and of itself a matter of choosing whether to have faith or not. Rather, I chose to act based on where I beleived I&#8217;d find happiness and freedom. I never really lost my faith in the church &#8211; for some reason the things that seem to trouble people about the church have never troubled me. But I did lose faith in the ability of the gospel to make me happy and free. I thought I&#8217;d find freedom in chooisng an identity: in creating myself, or, in a kind of Nietzchean way, being myself. And then, over time and after a LOT of difficulty and soul searching, and making myself and other people miserable, and close observation of myself and the people around me, and contrasting it to those few Mormons I knew understood and lived their religion &#8211; I began to find my faith again.</p>
<p>What I do think is that we can choose, day to day, even moment to moment, to think and, more importantly, act in ways that will strengthen or loosen our faith. Certain things we do bring the Spirit into our lives. At some point we may have to choose those things over things we temporarily love better. And that is very very difficult. It may be more difficult for some than for others -right, some have ten talents, some five, some one &#8211; we do not begin on equal footing. But consistant prayer, honest, searching and humble scripture study, a willingness to sacrifice, especially the willingness to sacrifice one&#8217;s worldly identity (the honors of men), in short living the gospel, which can very nearly be _defined_ as a mode of searching, will lead any person to the same _ultimate_ conclusions. We will grow from grace to grace.</p>
<p>Well, if we love better the voice of our totem jaguar spirit, or whatehaveyou, that will lead us to a different place. Those who find their lives lose it &#8211; those who lose thier lives, for Christ&#8217;s sake, will find it. I found that the most hateful scripture. Right along with the scripture that says that no man seeks for the Lord or His righteousness, but walks in his own way, after the image of his own god, which is in the image of the world. I personally wanted to be Lord Byron. Some other person might want something less dramatic &#8211; to be a success in some profession, or in the eyes of some people. Or when Pres Benson said that unless the roots of our faith go deep into the gospel as it is taught in the BoM in the heat of the day it will wither and die. I really hated all that stuff. It turned to be so, all the same.</p>
<p>~</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Who?</title>
		<link>http://bycommonconsent.com/2008/02/29/if-you-lose-your-faith/#comment-112634</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Who?]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 20:35:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bycommonconsent.com/2008/02/if-you-lose-your-faith/#comment-112634</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[JNS: Well, given my background in cognitive neuroscience, I will simply differ. The book in fact does assume that -- have you even read it? The certain belief I have that &quot;all humans are mortal, I am a man, therefore I am mortal&quot; is not based on feeling or the limbic system. In fact, there is no limbic system involvement in that kind of certainty at all! Further, the notion that choice is merely a frontal lobe activity is naive at best -- as I&#039;ll bet you&#039;re well aware. It may be that &quot;feeling&quot; certain is a result of limbic systems -- but is that all it is due to? Would you suggest that the testimonies of each church member is merely a collocation of chemicals in the limbic system and not anything more? And if something more, then the assumptions and methodology of Burton are not really the sole story as it argues.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JNS: Well, given my background in cognitive neuroscience, I will simply differ. The book in fact does assume that &#8212; have you even read it? The certain belief I have that &#8220;all humans are mortal, I am a man, therefore I am mortal&#8221; is not based on feeling or the limbic system. In fact, there is no limbic system involvement in that kind of certainty at all! Further, the notion that choice is merely a frontal lobe activity is naive at best &#8212; as I&#8217;ll bet you&#8217;re well aware. It may be that &#8220;feeling&#8221; certain is a result of limbic systems &#8212; but is that all it is due to? Would you suggest that the testimonies of each church member is merely a collocation of chemicals in the limbic system and not anything more? And if something more, then the assumptions and methodology of Burton are not really the sole story as it argues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John C.</title>
		<link>http://bycommonconsent.com/2008/02/29/if-you-lose-your-faith/#comment-112633</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John C.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 20:33:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bycommonconsent.com/2008/02/if-you-lose-your-faith/#comment-112633</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Matt/JNS,
If we tie a given emotional state to a given bit of evidence, how is that not cognition?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt/JNS,<br />
If we tie a given emotional state to a given bit of evidence, how is that not cognition?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

