<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Steadying the Ark</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bycommonconsent.com/2008/06/21/steadying-the-ark/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bycommonconsent.com/2008/06/21/steadying-the-ark/</link>
	<description>A Mormon Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 20:12:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: U.H.</title>
		<link>http://bycommonconsent.com/2008/06/21/steadying-the-ark/#comment-106038</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[U.H.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 21:29:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bycommonconsent.com/?p=3927#comment-106038</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Steven P.

I agree that there are many truths to be found in all scriptural stories, and that sincere study and prayer are the keys that open the door to all kinds of inspired insights. I believe it is an entirely different practice to add one&#039;s own &quot;subsequent embellishments&quot; so that the story agrees with a personal opinion.

Mark IV,
I&#039;m not saying that leaving that late in the season WAS the right thing to do either. The company heard what Elder Savage had to say and some chose to go and others chose to stay behind. They made an informed decision based on what they knew at the time. What NONE of them knew was that those in Salt Lake City had no idea that two parties were en route that late in the season and therefore no provisions had been stockpiled for them along the way, and no &quot;help&quot; would find them until it was almost too late. Had the expected supplies and aid been available at anticipated points the party probably would have not lost so many lives.

Many other pioneers died during the trek west that did not leave late in the season. The journey was rough. It was physically taxing for the healthy and young, much more so for the elderly, frail, or otherwise. They still chose to go. They had faith in something beyond the Salt Lake Valley. They saw the bigger picture. More than 100 miles from Nauvoo, William Clayton received word that the pregnant (and sick with ague and the mumps) wife he left behind had given birth to a healthy baby boy. In his gratitude to God, he penned the words to what we know as &quot;Come, Come, Ye Saints&quot;. That song includes the sentiment &quot;And should we die, before our journey&#039;s through-Happy Day! All is well! We then are free, from toil and sorrow too; with the just, we shall dwell!&quot;

These people were not ark steadiers, they were ark believers. They put their trust in God and His ark and went where it went. If following meant hardship and pain, they endured it. If the price was hunger and thirst, they did without. If the Lord requested their lives-they consecrated them to Him. They buried their dead in shallow graves knowing the wolves were waiting in the darkness and followed the ark.

The question always in my mind is &quot;Am I that willing? Am I that faithful?&quot; And whether I am or not yet, I truly want to be.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steven P.</p>
<p>I agree that there are many truths to be found in all scriptural stories, and that sincere study and prayer are the keys that open the door to all kinds of inspired insights. I believe it is an entirely different practice to add one&#8217;s own &#8220;subsequent embellishments&#8221; so that the story agrees with a personal opinion.</p>
<p>Mark IV,<br />
I&#8217;m not saying that leaving that late in the season WAS the right thing to do either. The company heard what Elder Savage had to say and some chose to go and others chose to stay behind. They made an informed decision based on what they knew at the time. What NONE of them knew was that those in Salt Lake City had no idea that two parties were en route that late in the season and therefore no provisions had been stockpiled for them along the way, and no &#8220;help&#8221; would find them until it was almost too late. Had the expected supplies and aid been available at anticipated points the party probably would have not lost so many lives.</p>
<p>Many other pioneers died during the trek west that did not leave late in the season. The journey was rough. It was physically taxing for the healthy and young, much more so for the elderly, frail, or otherwise. They still chose to go. They had faith in something beyond the Salt Lake Valley. They saw the bigger picture. More than 100 miles from Nauvoo, William Clayton received word that the pregnant (and sick with ague and the mumps) wife he left behind had given birth to a healthy baby boy. In his gratitude to God, he penned the words to what we know as &#8220;Come, Come, Ye Saints&#8221;. That song includes the sentiment &#8220;And should we die, before our journey&#8217;s through-Happy Day! All is well! We then are free, from toil and sorrow too; with the just, we shall dwell!&#8221;</p>
<p>These people were not ark steadiers, they were ark believers. They put their trust in God and His ark and went where it went. If following meant hardship and pain, they endured it. If the price was hunger and thirst, they did without. If the Lord requested their lives-they consecrated them to Him. They buried their dead in shallow graves knowing the wolves were waiting in the darkness and followed the ark.</p>
<p>The question always in my mind is &#8220;Am I that willing? Am I that faithful?&#8221; And whether I am or not yet, I truly want to be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Evans</title>
		<link>http://bycommonconsent.com/2008/06/21/steadying-the-ark/#comment-106037</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve Evans]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 18:04:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bycommonconsent.com/?p=3927#comment-106037</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Steve, you were asking for it then.  That&#039;s like saying re: WoW, &quot;Not when it&#039;s delicious!&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve, you were asking for it then.  That&#8217;s like saying re: WoW, &#8220;Not when it&#8217;s delicious!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Brown</title>
		<link>http://bycommonconsent.com/2008/06/21/steadying-the-ark/#comment-106036</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Brown]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:49:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bycommonconsent.com/?p=3927#comment-106036</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Steve, probably in connection to the question about sustaining leaders.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve, probably in connection to the question about sustaining leaders.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://bycommonconsent.com/2008/06/21/steadying-the-ark/#comment-106035</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:49:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bycommonconsent.com/?p=3927#comment-106035</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When he asked if I sustained my local leaders I said, &quot;Not if they ask me to do something wrong.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When he asked if I sustained my local leaders I said, &#8220;Not if they ask me to do something wrong.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Evans</title>
		<link>http://bycommonconsent.com/2008/06/21/steadying-the-ark/#comment-106034</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve Evans]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:45:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bycommonconsent.com/?p=3927#comment-106034</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why on earth did this come up in a TR recommend interview?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why on earth did this come up in a TR recommend interview?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://bycommonconsent.com/2008/06/21/steadying-the-ark/#comment-106033</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:35:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bycommonconsent.com/?p=3927#comment-106033</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sorry for this rather long post.

This is a question for NoCoolName_Tom. Of course, any other answers would also be welcome.

During the year 2000, in a Temple recommend interview, I told my Stake President that my wife and I had refused a calling in the Ward (which was in Utah County). He asked me to explain why. I told him we had refused the calling because the Bishop had asked us to do something that we felt was against the budget guidelines regarding the Scouting program. The Bishop became very upset and had us meet with him and his counselors. He told us during that meeting with his counselors that our refusal to accept his call was wrong. He further explained that the Church had no business telling the Scouting program how to operate and that he had the right to receive inspiration on how his ward should operate. He said the Church was wrong for not allowing scouts to raise as much money as they wanted, that the youth today needed more money than what the budget guidelines allowed, and that the First Presidency were out of touch with reality of what the youth of today were facing. I told him he could run his ward however he wanted, but that he would have to find someone else besides us to help him do it. Fortunately, one of his counselors was very concerned and was able to calm the Bishop down and convinced him to let us leave. Thank goodness, he was also the counselor that interviewed us for a Temple recommend.

When the Stake President heard all this he told me I was absolutely correct to refuse the calling and that he would stop the practice of Scout fund raising in that ward. Then he asked me to report to him on a periodic basis about anything else I noticed to be incorrect in the ward operations. I refused and said, &quot;I&#039;m not an ark-steadier.&quot; I wanted to tell him that the Lord has ways of steadying his own ark and that I wasn&#039;t in a position to receive inspiration as to how that was to be accomplished. But since I wasn&#039;t in a position to counsel him, I just kept my mouth shut.

He wasn&#039;t very pleased with my response, but signed my Temple Recommend anyway. I got a job transfer to another state just a few weeks after this incident. I don&#039;t know what happened to the scouting program in that area after we moved.

My question: Should I have accepted the Bishop&#039;s call, knowing that my personal integrity would have died, so that I could learn to have love and humility? Should I have accepted my Stake President&#039;s request to be his informant?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry for this rather long post.</p>
<p>This is a question for NoCoolName_Tom. Of course, any other answers would also be welcome.</p>
<p>During the year 2000, in a Temple recommend interview, I told my Stake President that my wife and I had refused a calling in the Ward (which was in Utah County). He asked me to explain why. I told him we had refused the calling because the Bishop had asked us to do something that we felt was against the budget guidelines regarding the Scouting program. The Bishop became very upset and had us meet with him and his counselors. He told us during that meeting with his counselors that our refusal to accept his call was wrong. He further explained that the Church had no business telling the Scouting program how to operate and that he had the right to receive inspiration on how his ward should operate. He said the Church was wrong for not allowing scouts to raise as much money as they wanted, that the youth today needed more money than what the budget guidelines allowed, and that the First Presidency were out of touch with reality of what the youth of today were facing. I told him he could run his ward however he wanted, but that he would have to find someone else besides us to help him do it. Fortunately, one of his counselors was very concerned and was able to calm the Bishop down and convinced him to let us leave. Thank goodness, he was also the counselor that interviewed us for a Temple recommend.</p>
<p>When the Stake President heard all this he told me I was absolutely correct to refuse the calling and that he would stop the practice of Scout fund raising in that ward. Then he asked me to report to him on a periodic basis about anything else I noticed to be incorrect in the ward operations. I refused and said, &#8220;I&#8217;m not an ark-steadier.&#8221; I wanted to tell him that the Lord has ways of steadying his own ark and that I wasn&#8217;t in a position to receive inspiration as to how that was to be accomplished. But since I wasn&#8217;t in a position to counsel him, I just kept my mouth shut.</p>
<p>He wasn&#8217;t very pleased with my response, but signed my Temple Recommend anyway. I got a job transfer to another state just a few weeks after this incident. I don&#8217;t know what happened to the scouting program in that area after we moved.</p>
<p>My question: Should I have accepted the Bishop&#8217;s call, knowing that my personal integrity would have died, so that I could learn to have love and humility? Should I have accepted my Stake President&#8217;s request to be his informant?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Markus</title>
		<link>http://bycommonconsent.com/2008/06/21/steadying-the-ark/#comment-106032</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Markus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 12:51:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bycommonconsent.com/?p=3927#comment-106032</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think something that we need to bear in mind is that the rules were a little clearer cut, in the OT. Since the start of the NT we have observed a higher (more complex) set of laws that correspond to the development of the human race as a whole.
So back in the days of Uzzah they were told &quot;don’t touch&quot; for whatever reason - Uzzah touched - even though it was for a good intention.
However the so called &quot;Ark steadiers&quot; choose to meddle (for the good or bad) and some similarity to Uzzah but the main objective is to maintain the status quo.
These should not be confused with individuals that followed a chosen path and faced the consequences.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think something that we need to bear in mind is that the rules were a little clearer cut, in the OT. Since the start of the NT we have observed a higher (more complex) set of laws that correspond to the development of the human race as a whole.<br />
So back in the days of Uzzah they were told &#8220;don’t touch&#8221; for whatever reason &#8211; Uzzah touched &#8211; even though it was for a good intention.<br />
However the so called &#8220;Ark steadiers&#8221; choose to meddle (for the good or bad) and some similarity to Uzzah but the main objective is to maintain the status quo.<br />
These should not be confused with individuals that followed a chosen path and faced the consequences.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TonyD</title>
		<link>http://bycommonconsent.com/2008/06/21/steadying-the-ark/#comment-106031</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[TonyD]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 02:48:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bycommonconsent.com/?p=3927#comment-106031</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[#73 U.H.: Can I both agree and disagree? On one hand, God may desire things to be different (eg. evil, individual paths, free will choices.) At the same time, how can I deny that the very system allowing those things is His system? I can&#039;t believe in omnipotence and deny it at the same time.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#73 U.H.: Can I both agree and disagree? On one hand, God may desire things to be different (eg. evil, individual paths, free will choices.) At the same time, how can I deny that the very system allowing those things is His system? I can&#8217;t believe in omnipotence and deny it at the same time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray</title>
		<link>http://bycommonconsent.com/2008/06/21/steadying-the-ark/#comment-106030</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ray]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 02:06:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bycommonconsent.com/?p=3927#comment-106030</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[“Too often we focus on the truth of the story, when we ought to be focusing on the truths in the story.”

I really like that, Steven.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“Too often we focus on the truth of the story, when we ought to be focusing on the truths in the story.”</p>
<p>I really like that, Steven.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven P</title>
		<link>http://bycommonconsent.com/2008/06/21/steadying-the-ark/#comment-106029</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven P]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 01:25:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bycommonconsent.com/?p=3927#comment-106029</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[U.H. Good point I don&#039;t disagree that the OT be taken seriously. Just too often it is taken literally were it should not be. I have a friend that says it well. &quot;Too often we focus on the truth of the story, when we ought to be focusing on the truths in the story.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>U.H. Good point I don&#8217;t disagree that the OT be taken seriously. Just too often it is taken literally were it should not be. I have a friend that says it well. &#8220;Too often we focus on the truth of the story, when we ought to be focusing on the truths in the story.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

