<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why BIV would totally have slept with with JS. Polyandry Part II</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bycommonconsent.com/2009/01/06/why-biv-would-totally-have-slept-with-with-js-polyandry-part-ii/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bycommonconsent.com/2009/01/06/why-biv-would-totally-have-slept-with-with-js-polyandry-part-ii/</link>
	<description>A Mormon Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 04:41:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Seth R.</title>
		<link>http://bycommonconsent.com/2009/01/06/why-biv-would-totally-have-slept-with-with-js-polyandry-part-ii/#comment-107126</link>
		<dc:creator>Seth R.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 04:50:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bycommonconsent.com/?p=4511#comment-107126</guid>
		<description>Use of the word &quot;us&quot; was never meant to convey the meaning that anyone else here agrees with my position.

I don&#039;t think that my sentence does convey that meaning really.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Use of the word &#8220;us&#8221; was never meant to convey the meaning that anyone else here agrees with my position.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think that my sentence does convey that meaning really.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antonio Parr</title>
		<link>http://bycommonconsent.com/2009/01/06/why-biv-would-totally-have-slept-with-with-js-polyandry-part-ii/#comment-107125</link>
		<dc:creator>Antonio Parr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 04:37:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bycommonconsent.com/?p=4511#comment-107125</guid>
		<description>Last thought of the night:

#62: &lt;em&gt;I don’t understand the eternities well enough to be confident about any of this, so I hold to the faith that God will straighten everything out in the end in a way that finally will make sense and bring happiness to all involved.&lt;/em&gt;

Amen, Ray.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last thought of the night:</p>
<p>#62: <em>I don’t understand the eternities well enough to be confident about any of this, so I hold to the faith that God will straighten everything out in the end in a way that finally will make sense and bring happiness to all involved.</em></p>
<p>Amen, Ray.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antonio Parr</title>
		<link>http://bycommonconsent.com/2009/01/06/why-biv-would-totally-have-slept-with-with-js-polyandry-part-ii/#comment-107124</link>
		<dc:creator>Antonio Parr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 04:34:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bycommonconsent.com/?p=4511#comment-107124</guid>
		<description>Sorry, Seth, I know that I should let this slide, but I am tired and can&#039;t resist . . .

You wrote

&lt;em&gt;I don’t advocate the mortal practice of polygamy because of the obvious potential for problems. But I don’t find the mere concept abhorrent in the slightest. If you don’t want your heaven like that, fine, but keep &lt;strong&gt;us&lt;/strong&gt; out of it.&lt;/em&gt;

Who is the &quot;us&quot; to which you refer?  This rather engaging blog would be less so if all of the posts read &quot;me, too&quot;; &quot;me, too&quot;; &quot;me, too&quot;; etc.  I find the exchange of sincere and thoughtful ideas to be a wonderful thing (even when people of good will disagree), and believe such a dialogue to be an essential element of the quest for wisdom that is one of the callings of mortality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, Seth, I know that I should let this slide, but I am tired and can&#8217;t resist . . .</p>
<p>You wrote</p>
<p><em>I don’t advocate the mortal practice of polygamy because of the obvious potential for problems. But I don’t find the mere concept abhorrent in the slightest. If you don’t want your heaven like that, fine, but keep <strong>us</strong> out of it.</em></p>
<p>Who is the &#8220;us&#8221; to which you refer?  This rather engaging blog would be less so if all of the posts read &#8220;me, too&#8221;; &#8220;me, too&#8221;; &#8220;me, too&#8221;; etc.  I find the exchange of sincere and thoughtful ideas to be a wonderful thing (even when people of good will disagree), and believe such a dialogue to be an essential element of the quest for wisdom that is one of the callings of mortality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SteveP</title>
		<link>http://bycommonconsent.com/2009/01/06/why-biv-would-totally-have-slept-with-with-js-polyandry-part-ii/#comment-107123</link>
		<dc:creator>SteveP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 04:26:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bycommonconsent.com/?p=4511#comment-107123</guid>
		<description>Well said, StillConfused.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well said, StillConfused.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antonio Parr</title>
		<link>http://bycommonconsent.com/2009/01/06/why-biv-would-totally-have-slept-with-with-js-polyandry-part-ii/#comment-107122</link>
		<dc:creator>Antonio Parr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 04:25:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bycommonconsent.com/?p=4511#comment-107122</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;If you do not wish to embrace the idea, then you need not do so. But nobody gave you the right to dictate eternal terms for the rest of us.&lt;/em&gt;

I wouldn&#039;t try (and wasn&#039;t trying) to dictate eternal terms for anyone, Seth.  I was merely voicing my opinion, as are you.

If you feel good about polygamy, or if you even desire such an arrangement in the hereafter, that is your right.  I much prefer the beautiful monogamy celebrated so exquisitely by the modern LDS Church.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>If you do not wish to embrace the idea, then you need not do so. But nobody gave you the right to dictate eternal terms for the rest of us.</em></p>
<p>I wouldn&#8217;t try (and wasn&#8217;t trying) to dictate eternal terms for anyone, Seth.  I was merely voicing my opinion, as are you.</p>
<p>If you feel good about polygamy, or if you even desire such an arrangement in the hereafter, that is your right.  I much prefer the beautiful monogamy celebrated so exquisitely by the modern LDS Church.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: StillConfused</title>
		<link>http://bycommonconsent.com/2009/01/06/why-biv-would-totally-have-slept-with-with-js-polyandry-part-ii/#comment-107121</link>
		<dc:creator>StillConfused</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 23:41:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bycommonconsent.com/?p=4511#comment-107121</guid>
		<description>I like Laura&#039;s story.  I like Antonio&#039;s story.  I am glad that we have a location where we can all share our experiences and thoughts, even though they may greatly differ from each other.  It is this ability to view certain aspects from completely different viewpoints and still feel bound by a common faith that gives me hope in my travels.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like Laura&#8217;s story.  I like Antonio&#8217;s story.  I am glad that we have a location where we can all share our experiences and thoughts, even though they may greatly differ from each other.  It is this ability to view certain aspects from completely different viewpoints and still feel bound by a common faith that gives me hope in my travels.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray</title>
		<link>http://bycommonconsent.com/2009/01/06/why-biv-would-totally-have-slept-with-with-js-polyandry-part-ii/#comment-107120</link>
		<dc:creator>Ray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 23:19:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bycommonconsent.com/?p=4511#comment-107120</guid>
		<description>Antonio, I forgot to add, &quot;Thank you for your response to Laura&#039;s story.&quot;  I mean that sincerely.  In its own right, it was as powerful as the story itself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Antonio, I forgot to add, &#8220;Thank you for your response to Laura&#8217;s story.&#8221;  I mean that sincerely.  In its own right, it was as powerful as the story itself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Juliann</title>
		<link>http://bycommonconsent.com/2009/01/06/why-biv-would-totally-have-slept-with-with-js-polyandry-part-ii/#comment-107119</link>
		<dc:creator>Juliann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 23:14:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bycommonconsent.com/?p=4511#comment-107119</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;The Spirit impresses upon my mind that PM had been crucial/necessary/pivotal to the Restoration of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

Thank you very much for that story, Laura. I think this is an excellent summation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>The Spirit impresses upon my mind that PM had been crucial/necessary/pivotal to the Restoration of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. </p></blockquote>
<p>Thank you very much for that story, Laura. I think this is an excellent summation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Lester</title>
		<link>http://bycommonconsent.com/2009/01/06/why-biv-would-totally-have-slept-with-with-js-polyandry-part-ii/#comment-107118</link>
		<dc:creator>John Lester</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 23:13:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bycommonconsent.com/?p=4511#comment-107118</guid>
		<description>http://www.righteouswarriors.com/controversial/article9.html

The above is an excellent article on the subject of polygyny.

&quot;Feelings&quot; are one thing, and Holy Writ are another. To wit:


      Isaiah 55:9
        9 For as the heavens are higher than the earth, so are my ways higher than your ways, and my thoughts than your thoughts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.righteouswarriors.com/controversial/article9.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.righteouswarriors.com/controversial/article9.html</a></p>
<p>The above is an excellent article on the subject of polygyny.</p>
<p>&#8220;Feelings&#8221; are one thing, and Holy Writ are another. To wit:</p>
<p>      Isaiah 55:9<br />
        9 For as the heavens are higher than the earth, so are my ways higher than your ways, and my thoughts than your thoughts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seth R.</title>
		<link>http://bycommonconsent.com/2009/01/06/why-biv-would-totally-have-slept-with-with-js-polyandry-part-ii/#comment-107117</link>
		<dc:creator>Seth R.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 22:48:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bycommonconsent.com/?p=4511#comment-107117</guid>
		<description>Afraid I just don&#039;t feel the same way about it Antonio.

And I don&#039;t think your personal scruples and feelings are to be taken as a guide for anyone&#039;s relationship but your own.

If you don&#039;t like the practice, fine. But don&#039;t go around telling the rest of us how we are obligated to spend our eternities. If a women loses a husband to death and remarries, who are you to force her to choose between the two just to meet up with your preconceptions of a happy family?

This is a denial of love and the human heart at the most basic level.

I do not believe that polygamy will be forced upon the unwilling in the hereafter. But I also believe it will exist. And I believe it &lt;em&gt;should&lt;/em&gt; exist.

If you do not wish to embrace the idea, then you need not do so. But nobody gave you the right to dictate eternal terms for the rest of us.

I don&#039;t advocate the mortal practice of polygamy because of the obvious potential for problems. But I don&#039;t find the mere concept abhorrent in the slightest. If you don&#039;t want your heaven like that, fine, but keep us out of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Afraid I just don&#8217;t feel the same way about it Antonio.</p>
<p>And I don&#8217;t think your personal scruples and feelings are to be taken as a guide for anyone&#8217;s relationship but your own.</p>
<p>If you don&#8217;t like the practice, fine. But don&#8217;t go around telling the rest of us how we are obligated to spend our eternities. If a women loses a husband to death and remarries, who are you to force her to choose between the two just to meet up with your preconceptions of a happy family?</p>
<p>This is a denial of love and the human heart at the most basic level.</p>
<p>I do not believe that polygamy will be forced upon the unwilling in the hereafter. But I also believe it will exist. And I believe it <em>should</em> exist.</p>
<p>If you do not wish to embrace the idea, then you need not do so. But nobody gave you the right to dictate eternal terms for the rest of us.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t advocate the mortal practice of polygamy because of the obvious potential for problems. But I don&#8217;t find the mere concept abhorrent in the slightest. If you don&#8217;t want your heaven like that, fine, but keep us out of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
