Comments on: Teh Nacle of the Bloggers http://bycommonconsent.com/2009/02/25/teh-nacle-of-the-bloggers/ A Mormon Blog Tue, 14 Feb 2012 01:16:43 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: Ronan http://bycommonconsent.com/2009/02/25/teh-nacle-of-the-bloggers/#comment-123080 Thu, 26 Feb 2009 18:48:58 +0000 http://bycommonconsent.com/?p=5856#comment-123080 1. There are many blogs written by Mormons.
2. Some Mormon blogs fall into the so-called “mommy blog” category.
3. Some blogs have traditionally been labelled as members of the “Bloggernacle,” one portal into which is ldsblogs.org.
4. The term “Bloggernacle” was coined in relation to the blogs that coalesced around Times and Seasons, BCC and others in 2003.
5. A recent article suggested that the Bloggernacle began with, and is characterised wholly by, the mommy blogs.
6. This article was wrong.
7. Those that pointed this out were passing no judgement on the mommy blogs.
8. Accusations to the contrary have been rather unfortunate. As has been some of the counter-snark.
9. The End.

]]> By: Ardis Parshall http://bycommonconsent.com/2009/02/25/teh-nacle-of-the-bloggers/#comment-123079 Thu, 26 Feb 2009 18:45:39 +0000 http://bycommonconsent.com/?p=5856#comment-123079 The difference is that the Trib column I write for money, and my blog I write for Mormondom. Both types of writing are done honestly, but my constant awareness of who I’m writing for, and why, colors what I write, and how.

There are other things that some do for love and others do for money as well.

]]> By: Anon http://bycommonconsent.com/2009/02/25/teh-nacle-of-the-bloggers/#comment-123078 Thu, 26 Feb 2009 18:40:50 +0000 http://bycommonconsent.com/?p=5856#comment-123078 I’m assuming you are paid for your column, right? Is that ugly?

What’s the difference?

]]> By: Anon http://bycommonconsent.com/2009/02/25/teh-nacle-of-the-bloggers/#comment-123077 Thu, 26 Feb 2009 18:39:49 +0000 http://bycommonconsent.com/?p=5856#comment-123077 So why is it ugly to take ad income?

]]> By: Ardis Parshall http://bycommonconsent.com/2009/02/25/teh-nacle-of-the-bloggers/#comment-123076 Thu, 26 Feb 2009 18:38:57 +0000 http://bycommonconsent.com/?p=5856#comment-123076 Robert Kirby’s column is no uglier than mine. Just more frequent.

]]> By: Researcher http://bycommonconsent.com/2009/02/25/teh-nacle-of-the-bloggers/#comment-123075 Thu, 26 Feb 2009 18:38:54 +0000 http://bycommonconsent.com/?p=5856#comment-123075 Sage and cream, chris? Are you talking about BCC? It’s definitely sage and white with gray sidebars.

]]> By: erica http://bycommonconsent.com/2009/02/25/teh-nacle-of-the-bloggers/#comment-123074 Thu, 26 Feb 2009 18:35:32 +0000 http://bycommonconsent.com/?p=5856#comment-123074 Speaking of enchilladas…

http://ericasbloggityblog.blogspot.com/2009/02/hot-mess-good.html

]]> By: Steve Evans http://bycommonconsent.com/2009/02/25/teh-nacle-of-the-bloggers/#comment-123073 Thu, 26 Feb 2009 18:35:19 +0000 http://bycommonconsent.com/?p=5856#comment-123073 chris, huh? You might have misread things there.

]]> By: chris http://bycommonconsent.com/2009/02/25/teh-nacle-of-the-bloggers/#comment-123072 Thu, 26 Feb 2009 18:30:50 +0000 http://bycommonconsent.com/?p=5856#comment-123072 And like that, suddenly the Bloggernacle is also the design mavens of the Blogosphere as well. What with their sage/cream-colored blogs and non-existent aesthetics.

Move Over, Design Mom and Oh Happy Day there are new Mormons calling out ugly.

]]> By: Jami http://bycommonconsent.com/2009/02/25/teh-nacle-of-the-bloggers/#comment-123071 Thu, 26 Feb 2009 18:23:03 +0000 http://bycommonconsent.com/?p=5856#comment-123071 204. Yes.

]]>