Comments on: Interview with Michael Otterson

By: Kristine

Kristine — Thu, 11 Jun 2009 02:24:39 +0000

Peter LLC–we actually had to BEG Brother Otterson not to address those topics, lest his well-reasoned and articulate answers impede the free flow of conspiracy theory and wild-eyed speculation that make the bloggernacle go ’round.

By: Tracy M

Tracy M — Wed, 10 Jun 2009 20:26:00 +0000

Very nice interview, Steve. Thanks to Brother Otterson for taking the time to respond.

By: Steve Evans

Steve Evans — Wed, 10 Jun 2009 20:02:02 +0000

Margaret, feminism = Old Era.

By: Margaret Young

Margaret Young — Wed, 10 Jun 2009 19:01:40 +0000

I like the principle-based questions and answers. It would be a whole different interview were Brother Otterson to address such things as Prop 8, the priesthood restriction, and FEMINISM in general. (Young people think the ERA stands for the magazine they get every month.)
Well done.

By: Peter LLC

Peter LLC — Wed, 10 Jun 2009 15:59:37 +0000

Were these softball tosses all you had? What about Prop 8, 1978 and, for good measure, ERA?

By: Eric Nielson

Eric Nielson — Wed, 10 Jun 2009 15:41:22 +0000

Brother Otterson always gives such reasonable explanations for things. I admire him quite a bit. He is an excellent representative.

By: Ray

Ray — Wed, 10 Jun 2009 15:00:27 +0000

I loved Bro. Otterson’s answer about what members can do.

Thanks for this interview, Steve.

By: Steve Evans

Steve Evans — Wed, 10 Jun 2009 13:27:26 +0000

Sheesh Ben!

By: Scott B.

Scott B. — Wed, 10 Jun 2009 13:13:53 +0000

Well done Steve and thanks to Bro Otterson for responding so openly. Very timely post for all Chuch members to see.

By: Ben

Ben — Wed, 10 Jun 2009 11:38:40 +0000

"Some people will go to the official source, and we hope they do, but most rely more on third-party, neutral sites to help them form opinions about an organization or an issue." Hmm, sounds like a description of the Patheos library and gateway.